Skip to main content

Security report for radclub.de

Radclub · Transportation · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radclub.de is a German-language cycling community platform founded around 2019, offering members benefits, discounts, events, and media content related to cycling. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Smart Slider 3, and membership plugins. It is hosted with INWX, a reputable German registrar and hosting provider. The site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a basic security posture. However, it lacks publicly accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. Contact information includes a domain-specific email and social media presence on Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook. No security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. Overall, the site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy for its target cycling audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radclub.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention radclub.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for radclub.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Radclub operates in the transportation sector focusing on cycling enthusiasts and commuters in Germany. Its business model centers on community membership with access to exclusive discounts, events, and content. The platform leverages partnerships with cycling brands and media outlets like radfahren.de. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a clear market niche. Growth indicators include active content updates and social media engagement. The absence of detailed business registration info limits deeper corporate intelligence. The ecosystem includes trusted cycling product partners and event organizers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of security/privacy plugins such as Borlabs Cookie and Ultimate Member GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, and incident response contacts represents compliance and transparency gaps. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident, which could enhance protection. The site should regularly audit plugins and maintain updated security practices to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user rights and security practices.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and server configurations to prevent vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radclub
Description
Deals & Events rund ums Rad
Key services
Community membership, Discounts on cycling products and services, Events and experiences, Podcasts and media content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Smart Slider 3, Ultimate Member plugin, Borlabs Cookie plugin, AddToAny sharing plugin, jQuery
Frameworks
Foundation (CSS framework inferred from classes), Smart Slider 3 JS framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins (Borlabs Cookie, Ultimate Member GDPR)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny sharing, Borlabs Cookie for consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German cycling community platform with membership benefits and events
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, membership, cookie consent, and sliders
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap
  4. Contact email is provided and consistent with domain
  5. Social media presence on Instagram, YouTube, Facebook
  6. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Good SSL and basic security practices observed
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern plugin ecosystem including Yoast SEO for optimization, Smart Slider 3 for interactive content, and Ultimate Member for user management. Hosting is via INWX, a German provider, ensuring regional compliance and performance. The site is mobile-optimized and uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI enhancements. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. The technical stack is current but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radclub.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radclub.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.