Skip to main content

Security report for raceresult.com

race result AG · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Race Result Americas Inc. operates a professional website focused on providing comprehensive sports event timing and scoring solutions, including hardware, software, and online registration services. The company positions itself as an innovation leader in sports timing technology with a global customer base and a medium-sized business footprint. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and optimized for mobile devices, featuring rich content such as testimonials, product showcases, and news updates. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and implements HTTPS with secure login features including two-factor authentication. Privacy compliance is robust with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and contact information strongly support a legitimate business presence. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with good security posture but would benefit from enhanced security headers and explicit incident response disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of raceresult.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raceresult.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention raceresult.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
826
Employees
0
Customers
826
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for raceresult.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Race Result Americas Inc. targets sports event organizers, race timers, and athletes by offering timing systems, software, and related supplies. Their business model combines B2B and B2C sales with rental services. The company enjoys a strong market position as an innovation leader with a global reach, supported by customer testimonials and active social media engagement. Revenue streams likely include hardware sales, software licensing, rental fees, and support services. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and a physical address in the United States. Strategic observations include a focus on continuous innovation, customer support, and expanding global footprint. The lack of WHOIS transparency suggests a need for domain registration verification to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced, secure login forms supporting two-factor authentication, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are not detected. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but is managed with user consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. To improve, the company should implement security headers, publish a vulnerability disclosure policy, and provide clear incident response contacts to enhance transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize security risks and maintain performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RACE RESULT Americas Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
race result AG
Description
The complete solution for your sports event: online registration, scoring, race numbers, transponder systems for rent.
Key services
Sports event timing systems, Timing software (RACE RESULT 12), Online registration portals, Race numbers and transponder rentals, Support and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Fancybox, Typekit fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Two-factor authentication available
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Secure login forms with 2FA

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  3. Multiple contact methods including form, email, phone, and physical address
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  5. No explicit security.txt or incident response info found
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
  7. Strong branding and professional design with global customer testimonials
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Fancybox, and Google Tag Manager, with Typekit fonts for typography. The site is mobile responsive and well-optimized for SEO with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with smooth slideshow transitions and interactive elements. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses asynchronous script loading for analytics and consent management, improving load times. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended to enhance overall robustness and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raceresult.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raceresult.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.