Race for the Cure is a European event organization focused on hosting the largest run and walk events across Europe, primarily aimed at charity participation. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and a focus on participant engagement. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with Telerik UI components and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern web fonts and libraries, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and IP anonymization in analytics, but lacks explicit security headers and visible incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Business credibility is moderate with good content quality but no explicit contact or company information disclosed. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and transparency measures.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention raceforthecure.eu, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for raceforthecure.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The organization operates in the non-profit sector, organizing large-scale running and walking events to support charities across Europe. Their market position is strong as the largest run & walk event in Europe, targeting participants interested in sports and charity. The business model revolves around event management and fundraising. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized operation with a focus on participant experience and charity promotion. There is no public information on company founding year or parent/subsidiary relationships. The use of professional web technologies and integration with Google services suggests a moderate digital maturity. Lack of public WHOIS data limits external trust verification. No direct revenue streams or partnership domains were identified from the content.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization, indicating some privacy awareness. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for security issues. Forms are present but no explicit security measures or input validations were observed in the content. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were identified, but regular updates are recommended. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security headers, transparency, and incident response readiness.
Recommendations
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve security transparency and readiness.
Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and technical debt.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Race for the Cure is a European event organizing the biggest run and walk in Europe, focused on participation and charity.
ASP.NET, Telerik UI, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Bootstrap, Flickity, Blazy
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms, Telerik
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with Telerik UI components, indicating a mature but somewhat legacy technology stack. It uses Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Bootstrap, Flickity for UI/UX enhancements, and Blazy for lazy loading images. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is good with meta tags and Open Graph tags present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses a CMS platform likely DotNetNuke (DNN) based on module naming conventions. Technical risks include potential legacy codebase challenges and missing security headers.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with raceforthecure.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raceforthecure.eu.