Skip to main content

Security report for r1autorent.lv

R1 Autorent · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

R1 Autorent is a Latvian vehicle rental company specializing in buses, light cars, and trucks. The company targets general consumers and businesses needing transportation solutions within Latvia and potentially Europe. Their website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and social media presence, positioning them as a small but established local player in the transportation rental market. The business model focuses on direct vehicle rental services with online booking capabilities. Technically, the website employs common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Maps API, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility features. The presence of tracking scripts indicates moderate user data collection, though privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and exposes a Google Maps API key in the source code, which could be a risk. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security certifications are evident. Overall, the security posture is average with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards. The overall risk is moderate; the business appears legitimate and operational, but the lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies, combined with some security gaps, suggests the need for enhanced compliance and security measures to build greater trust and reduce potential risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching r1autorent.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

R1 Autorent operates in the transportation sector, focusing on vehicle rentals including buses, light vehicles, and trucks. The company appears to be a small-sized local business founded around 2014, serving customers primarily in Latvia with options for travel within the Baltics and Europe. Their competitive advantage lies in a diversified fleet and localized service with physical offices in Riga and Ulbroka. Revenue streams likely come from rental fees and additional services such as after-hours delivery surcharges. The company maintains an online presence with booking forms and social media engagement, indicating a moderate digital maturity. Partnerships include the use of schedulebull.com for booking infrastructure. Growth indicators are limited but the company maintains consistent branding and contact availability. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving digital compliance and expanding online marketing to enhance market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The exposure of the Google Maps API key without visible restrictions could lead to unauthorized usage. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which may delay mitigation of security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts without clear user consent further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security culture appears informal and would benefit from formalized policies, technical hardening, and transparency to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Restrict and secure the Google Maps API key usage to prevent unauthorized access and potential abuse.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security posture and stakeholder trust.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and broaden audience reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
R1 Autorent
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
R1 Autorent
Description
R1 Autorent provides car rental services including buses, light cars, and trucks.
Key services
Bus rental, Light car rental, Truck rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, YouTube Player API, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, and Draugiem.lv.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. Google Maps API key is exposed in the source code.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Website uses HTTPS but SSL configuration details unknown.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web technology stack centered around jQuery and jQuery UI for UI components, Google Maps API for location services, and Google Analytics with Tag Manager for tracking and analytics. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously, which helps performance but also introduces dependency on third-party services. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph). However, no modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The hosting provider is not identifiable from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced technical features such as structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO or security headers for improved protection. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with r1autorent.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review r1autorent.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.