Skip to main content

Security report for qantas.com

Qantas · Transportation · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qantas is a major Australian airline offering comprehensive passenger air travel services, including a frequent flyer program and business rewards. The website reflects a mature enterprise-level digital presence with consistent branding and professional content tailored to a general audience. The technical infrastructure leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS, modern JavaScript frameworks, and global CDN services, indicating a robust and scalable platform. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and OAuth login implemented, but lacks visible security headers and publicly accessible security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are not clearly found in the analyzed content, which may impact compliance. Overall, the domain appears legitimate despite unavailable WHOIS data, supported by strong brand presence and external partner domains.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qantas.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Qantas holds a strong market position as Australia's preferred airline, targeting general consumers and business travelers. Its business model centers on air transportation services with loyalty and rewards programs enhancing customer retention. The company operates at an enterprise scale with a global digital footprint. Partnerships such as Qantas Business Rewards indicate a broad ecosystem supporting corporate clients. The website's content and structure support clear navigation and service offerings, reinforcing Qantas's competitive advantage in the transportation sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and OAuth authentication for user accounts. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance indicators are minimal, with no clear cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policy found, which could pose regulatory risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Qantas
Description
Enjoy an all-inclusive service on Australia's favourite airline, with entertainment, refreshments and checked baggage on every Qantas flight.
Key services
Passenger air travel, Frequent flyer program, Business rewards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by react-responsive-modal styles), OAuth, Optimizely, Akamai CDN, Various third-party scripts (techlab-cdn.com)
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • OAuth enabled for login

Analytics and tracking

Services
Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Optimizely
Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. Site uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and modern JavaScript frameworks.
  4. OAuth login and frequent flyer programs indicate mature user management.
  5. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided HTML snippet.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  7. External scripts include Optimizely for A/B testing and techlab-cdn.com for analytics.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Content is professional, relevant to airline industry, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS with a modern JavaScript stack including React components and OAuth for authentication. It uses Akamai CDN for content delivery and Optimizely for A/B testing and analytics. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and alternate language links. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. However, the absence of visible security headers and incomplete privacy compliance documentation indicate technical debt in security and compliance areas. The infrastructure is scalable and enterprise-grade but requires enhancements in security best practices and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qantas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qantas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.