Skip to main content

Security report for puma.do

Puma Logistics · Transportation · Dominican Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Puma Logistics is a Dominican Republic-based integrated logistics service provider specializing in air, maritime, customs management, terrestrial transport, warehousing, value-added services, local distribution, and project cargo. The company positions itself as a local leader with international partnerships, notably representing DB Schenker in the Dominican Republic. Their website demonstrates a professional digital presence built on WordPress with Oxygen Builder, incorporating modern technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for security. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact channels, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and secure form handling. However, the absence of WHOIS data transparency slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, Puma Logistics presents a credible and professional business front with room for improvement in privacy compliance and domain transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching puma.do

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
70
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses requiring comprehensive logistics solutions in the Dominican Republic and internationally. Their business model focuses on integrated logistics services, leveraging partnerships with global players like DB Schenker. Key competitive advantages include ISO 9001:2015 certification, a broad service portfolio, and a focus on customer service and innovation. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a solid market position in transportation and logistics sectors. The presence of multilingual support (Spanish and English) suggests an intent to serve both local and international clients. No direct revenue streams or financial data are disclosed, but the service offerings imply B2B logistics operations with potential growth in supply chain optimization.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers, enhancing protection against common web attacks. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on the contact form mitigates spam and automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates gaps in formal security governance and transparency. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to formalize policies and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add incident response contact information, such as a security or abuse email address.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusiveness and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Puma Logistics
Description
Empresa de servicio logístico integrado fundada en Santo Domingo, República Dominicana. Proveen soluciones rápidas y efectivas para mejorar niveles de servicio, reducir costos y aumentar ventas. Representante de DB Schenker en República Dominicana.
Key services
Carga Aérea, Carga Marítima, Gestión Aduanal, Transporte Terrestre, Almacenamiento, Valor Agregado, Distribución Local, Carga de Proyectos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Oxygen Builder, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, Swiper Slider, TranslatePress Multilingual
Frameworks
Oxygen Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using Oxygen Builder, leveraging jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper for sliders. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes, and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. The site is multilingual via TranslatePress, supporting Spanish and English. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some improvements in accessibility and privacy compliance are recommended to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with puma.do. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review puma.do.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.