Skip to main content

Security report for psforwarding.cz

PS forwarding, s. r. o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PS forwarding, s. r. o. is a small Czech Republic-based transportation and forwarding company specializing in standard truck transport, oversized cargo transport requiring permits and escorts, and express or partial load deliveries. The company targets businesses needing reliable freight and logistics services within the region. The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform and hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN, incorporating Google Tag Manager for analytics. While the site is accessible and uses HTTPS, it lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and explicit contact details such as emails or phone numbers. These gaps reduce the overall security posture and privacy compliance of the site. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits trust verification but does not directly indicate malicious intent. Overall, the website provides basic business information with moderate technical implementation but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching psforwarding.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention psforwarding.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for psforwarding.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on freight forwarding and logistics services. Its business model revolves around providing tailored transport solutions including standard and oversized cargo shipments, as well as express deliveries. The website content suggests a local or regional market presence in the Czech Republic. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies may impact customer trust and limit business growth opportunities. The use of Webnode CMS and cloud hosting indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The company could benefit from enhancing its online presence with richer content, certifications, and transparent policies to strengthen market positioning.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, suggesting limited security governance. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is basic, with room for significant improvements in policy transparency, header implementation, and data protection practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer trust and support.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PS forwarding, s. r. o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PS forwarding, s. r. o.
Description
The company provides transportation and forwarding services including standard truck transport, oversized cargo transport with necessary permits and escort vehicles, and express deliveries or partial load shipments.
Key services
Standard truck transport, Oversized cargo transport with permits and escorts, Partial load and express transport
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. Contact information is limited to a physical address only; no emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. Website uses Webnode CMS and AWS Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  6. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  7. Content is minimal but relevant to transportation and forwarding services.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected on the homepage.
  9. No social media links or email addresses found.
  10. No security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform and leverages AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good performance and scalability. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with responsive design elements for mobile optimization. However, the absence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies suggests a basic technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate with no evident critical issues, but SEO and accessibility features are minimal. The site would benefit from enhanced technical SEO, accessibility improvements, and stronger security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with psforwarding.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review psforwarding.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.