Skip to main content

Security report for przekreslonyklos.pl

Polskie Stowarzyszenie Osób z Celiakią i na Diecie Bezglutenowej · Non-profit · Poland

Partial score · DNS & email only

42/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.przekreslonyklos.pl represents the Polish Association of People with Celiac Disease and on a Gluten-Free Diet, a non-profit organization dedicated to certifying gluten-free products and supporting the gluten-free community in Poland. The site serves as the official platform for licensing the Przekreślony Kłos trademark, a recognized symbol for safe gluten-free food. It also provides educational resources, events, and partnerships with European organizations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though it lacks a dedicated privacy policy page and some security headers. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency but the site's content and external references support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is a credible, professional resource for gluten-free certification and community support in Poland.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 22 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching przekreslonyklos.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
Average
42

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a unique market position as the sole licensor of the Przekreślony Kłos trademark in Poland, serving over 80 producers and certifying more than 2,200 products. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on licensing, education, and advocacy. The target audience includes food producers, consumers with celiac disease, and businesses interested in gluten-free certification. The association has strong partnerships with European bodies and maintains a significant presence in Poland through events and digital platforms. Revenue streams likely include licensing fees and donations. The organization demonstrates growth and influence in the gluten-free sector, supported by a consistent brand and trusted certifications.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and no outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response plan indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and documentation to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Implement security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Develop and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Polskie Stowarzyszenie Osób z Celiakią i na Diecie Bezglutenowej
Description
Certyfikowany znak Przekreślonego Kłosa jest symbolem bezpiecznej żywności bezglutenowej. Organizacja udziela licencji na używanie znaku towarowego Przekreślony Kłos w Polsce, wspiera osoby na diecie bezglutenowej oraz prowadzi edukację i działania na rzecz rynku bezglutenowego.
Key services
Licensing of Przekreślony Kłos trademark, Certification of gluten-free products, Educational workshops and conferences, Dietary counseling, Gluten Free EXPO trade fairs, Publishing guides and newsletters, Restaurant training programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Visual Composer (WPBakery), Contact Form 7, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery, Google Fonts (Roboto, Abril Fatface), Font Awesome, Linearicons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and focused on gluten-free food certification.
  3. No privacy policy page explicitly found, but cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  4. Contact form is present but no direct emails or phone numbers visible in HTML content.
  5. Strong branding consistency with logos and references to recognized organizations.
  6. Use of modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google services.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency but does not invalidate legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using version 6.8.3 with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Visual Composer for content management and SEO optimization. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site loads JavaScript libraries like jQuery and employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. The site uses external CDNs for fonts and icons, which aids performance but requires monitoring for availability. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or CDN providers from the HTML source. The technical stack is standard for a professional non-profit website but could be improved with enhanced security headers and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with przekreslonyklos.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review przekreslonyklos.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.