Skip to main content

Security report for pryncyp.com

Принцип · Non-profit · Ukraine

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.pryncyp.org represents a Ukrainian non-profit legal advocacy center named "Принцип" focused on supporting military personnel and veterans through legal aid, policy advocacy, and educational initiatives. Founded in 2023 by Masі Nayem and Liubov Galan, the organization provides pro bono legal consultations, conducts analytical research, and promotes veteran policies. The site is professionally designed using WordPress CMS with multilingual support and integrates common web technologies such as jQuery, Swiper, and Select2. It leverages Google Analytics for user tracking and includes donation mechanisms via Patreon and Liqpay. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification, but the website's content, social media presence, and professional branding support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-positioned as a trusted resource for its target audience with moderate technical maturity and good user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pryncyp.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Принцип operates in the non-profit sector, targeting Ukrainian military personnel, veterans, their families, and legal professionals. Its business model centers on advocacy, education, and pro bono legal services, supported by donations and partnerships. The organization has established a credible market position through policy development and research collaborations. Revenue streams likely include patronage and online donations. The partnership ecosystem includes Patreon for patron support, Liqpay for payment processing, and a web development partner. Growth indicators include active news and analytics content and multilingual site support. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive information in the HTML source. The use of nonce tokens in AJAX scripts indicates awareness of security best practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, which could hinder effective security incident management. GDPR compliance is partial, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies visible. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Develop and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to enhance security readiness and stakeholder trust.
  4. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Consider obtaining domain WHOIS transparency or justified privacy protection to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Принцип
Description
Правозахисний центр для військовослужбовців, команда юристів, аналітиків, адвокаційників, комунікаційників, що напрацьовує та просуває рішення у сфері правозахисту військових та ветеранів на системному рівні. Заснована у 2023 році Масі Найємом та Любов‘ю Галан.
Key services
Правозахист військових, Ветеранська політика, Юридичні консультації pro bono, Аналітичні дослідження, Освітні програми
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, WPML Multilingual CMS, jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper JS, Select2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce in AJAX scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Ukrainian with English alternate language version available.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found.
  4. Contact emails use company domain pryncyp.com.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram.
  6. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  8. Donation/payment processing via Patreon and Liqpay.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  10. No visible security headers in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper for sliders, and Select2 for enhanced select elements. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. There is no indication of hosting provider from the HTML source. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy policies suggests areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience suitable for the organization's mission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pryncyp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pryncyp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.