Skip to main content

Security report for provia.at

ÖBB Holding AG · Transportation · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProVia is a secure, official electronic procurement platform jointly operated by ÖBB Holding AG and ASFINAG, two major Austrian transportation infrastructure entities. It facilitates public procurement processes, contract management, and audit systems for companies wishing to provide services to these organizations. The platform targets business users and suppliers, providing a professional and government-compliant environment. The website content is primarily in German and includes clear instructions, support contacts, and legal terms. Technically, the site uses a modern web stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Kendo UI, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and anti-forgery tokens, though some HTTP security headers are missing and no cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture appropriate for a government-related procurement portal, with high trustworthiness and legitimacy based on WHOIS data and business alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching provia.at

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform serves as a critical B2B interface for public procurement in Austria's transportation sector, operated by ÖBB Holding AG and ASFINAG. Its business model centers on facilitating transparent and legally compliant tendering and contract management processes. The site’s market position is strong as the official portal for these entities, providing a competitive advantage through integration with federal procurement laws. Revenue streams likely derive from government budgets and operational contracts. The target customer segment includes suppliers and contractors in transportation infrastructure. The partnership ecosystem includes ASFINAG and ÖBB, reinforcing credibility. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining compliance with EU regulations and enhancing user experience to support supplier engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of anti-forgery tokens, and clear user guidance on password confidentiality. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a moderate risk. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the platform to compliance issues under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly documented, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the platform aligns with good security practices expected for government procurement portals but would benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to ensure compliance with EU privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ÖBB Holding AG
Description
ProVia is the electronic procurement platform of ÖBB and ASFINAG used for conducting procurement procedures according to federal procurement law, contract management, and audit system recording (only ÖBB). It invites companies offering services to ÖBB and ASFINAG to register.
Key services
Electronic tendering, Contract management, Audit system recording
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, TinyMCE, Knockout.js, Toastr, Moment.js, jqxWidgets, Kendo UI, Globalize.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No password requested by staff
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of anti-forgery tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional procurement portal for Austrian transportation entities ÖBB and ASFINAG.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at business users offering services to these entities.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  5. Security best practices partially implemented but missing some HTTP security headers.
  6. No explicit privacy policy page but terms of service document includes privacy-related clauses.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and emails for support.
  8. No social media links detected.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technology stack featuring jQuery, Bootstrap, TinyMCE, Knockout.js, Toastr, Moment.js, jqxWidgets, and Kendo UI, indicating a mature and modular front-end architecture. The backend is likely ASP.NET MVC based on URL patterns and anti-forgery tokens. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta description content. The site uses no detected CMS and hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of cookie consent, which could impact compliance and security posture. Opportunities exist to modernize accessibility and SEO features and enhance performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with provia.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review provia.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.