Skip to main content

Security report for proukrajinu.org

Nadační fond pro Ukrajinu · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadační fond pro Ukrajinu is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression. The organization operates a fundraising platform and an e-commerce site selling themed merchandise to raise funds. It has a strong media presence with mentions in major international outlets such as BBC, CNN, NYTimes, and Spiegel, indicating a reputable market position within the humanitarian aid sector. The website is primarily targeted at Czech and European audiences sympathetic to Ukraine's cause. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with good navigation and content relevance. However, some technical improvements could be made in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms to enhance compliance and security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in its HTML content. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, which slightly reduces trust but is common for non-profits. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement. The overall risk assessment is low, with the main recommendations focusing on enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent for GDPR compliance, and publishing security policies. These steps will improve user trust and regulatory compliance while maintaining the organization's positive reputation and operational effectiveness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proukrajinu.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on humanitarian aid and support for Ukraine. Its business model relies on donations and merchandise sales, targeting individuals and supporters primarily in the Czech Republic and Europe. The presence of multiple language versions and partnerships with related projects indicates a collaborative ecosystem and a broad outreach strategy. Revenue streams are likely from donations and e-commerce sales. The organization benefits from strong media coverage, which enhances its credibility and fundraising potential. The lack of direct phone contact suggests a digital-first engagement model. Strategic partnerships with other humanitarian projects strengthen its market position and operational reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leakage was observed. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy and terms documents, but the lack of cookie consent mechanisms is a compliance gap. Overall, the security culture appears nascent but can be improved with focused efforts on policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid introducing vulnerable libraries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadační fond pro Ukrajinu
Registration number
17964687
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond pro Ukrajinu
Description
Nadační fond pro Ukrajinu vznikl po roce neformálního fungování iniciativy #wemustact jako oficiální organizace, která se stará o podporu Ukrajiny v boji proti russké agresi.
Key services
Fundraising for Ukraine, Merchandise sales supporting the cause, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Fonts, Google WebFont Loader
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech non-profit focused on supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.
  2. Content is in Czech with multiple language versions linked.
  3. No forms detected on main page; no direct data collection forms visible.
  4. Contact information includes official email and physical address.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Uses modern web technologies and Webflow CMS.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Strong media presence and external references.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or query error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive elements. It uses Google Fonts and WebFont Loader for typography. The site is hosted likely on Webflow's infrastructure, which provides reliable performance and scalability. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph integration for social sharing. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some security best practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script optimization and caching. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proukrajinu.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proukrajinu.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.