Skip to main content

Security report for prorima.com

PRORIMA · Retail · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PRORIMA is a French distributor specializing in motocross equipment, primarily representing the 100% brand and other related brands. The company targets professional resellers and motocross enthusiasts, offering a B2B platform for equipment procurement. The website is professionally designed, with clear navigation and relevant content focused on the motocross retail sector in France. Technically, the site uses Apache server technology with JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and ResponsiveSlides.js, and employs a cookie consent management tool (tarteaucitron). The SSL certificate is valid but lacks modern TLS protocol support, indicating room for security improvements. Security headers are implemented adequately, but enhancements like longer HSTS duration and DNSSEC are recommended. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no company contact emails are visible, though a clear company phone number and Instagram social media link are provided.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prorima.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
75
GDPR outside view
40
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PRORIMA holds a niche position as a distributor of motocross equipment in France, focusing on professional reseller partnerships and exclusive brand distribution. Their business model centers on B2B sales with restricted access to professional clients, indicating a specialized market approach. The company leverages brand heritage (100% brand dating back to the 1980s) to appeal to motocross riders and retailers. The website content and structure support this positioning, with product showcases, news updates, and reseller locator features. The company appears small in size with a focused retail sector presence and no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized brands and mail service providers like Gandi and Mailjet.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with valid SSL certification and implementation of key security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and HSTS. However, the absence of modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) is a significant gap that could expose users to downgraded encryption risks. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, reducing domain security against certain attacks. Cookie management is compliant with GDPR, using a consent mechanism via tarteaucitron. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, which may impact transparency and readiness. Overall, the security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance encryption protocols, domain security, and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade server TLS configuration to support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to ensure strong encryption.
  2. Increase HSTS max-age to at least 6 months or 1 year and consider enabling includeSubDomains and preload for better protection.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to improve domain security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Add Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server with a single IPv4 address (54.36.220.99), likely a European hosting provider. The technology stack includes jQuery and ResponsiveSlides.js for UI components and tarteaucitron for cookie consent management. No CMS or major frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, though no detailed resource counts or page sizes were provided. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. However, the lack of modern TLS protocols and DNS security features indicates technical debt in security infrastructure. The site uses secure and HttpOnly cookies with SameSite=None for session management. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional and performant but requires modernization in security protocols and domain protection.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prorima.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prorima.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.