Skip to main content

Security report for propdata.net

Prop Data (Pty) Ltd · Real Estate · South Africa

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prop Data (Pty) Ltd operates a specialized internet marketing platform dedicated to the real estate sector, offering integrated solutions for listing management, digital marketing, and lead generation. The company positions itself as a trusted partner to over 20,000 real estate professionals and agencies, emphasizing a comprehensive PropTech ecosystem with strategic partnerships. Their website demonstrates a mature digital presence leveraging HubSpot CMS and modern web technologies, delivering a professional user experience with rich multimedia content and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and privacy compliance, though explicit security policies and incident response details are absent. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, Prop Data presents as a credible and professional business with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching propdata.net

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention propdata.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
297
Employees
0
Customers
294
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
10%

36 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for propdata.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prop Data's market positioning as a leading real estate marketing platform is reinforced by its extensive client base and partnerships with notable PropTech companies. Their business model combines SaaS offerings with digital marketing services, targeting brokers, agencies, and developers primarily in South Africa. The company leverages educational content and webinars to engage its audience, enhancing customer retention and brand authority. Integration with major marketing and analytics platforms like HubSpot and Google Analytics supports data-driven decision-making. The partnership ecosystem and client testimonials indicate a strong competitive advantage and growth potential. However, the lack of visible domain registration data could impact trust and requires remediation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes key security headers, reflecting good security hygiene. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The site would benefit from publishing these documents and establishing clear channels for security incident reporting. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prop Data (Pty) Ltd
Description
Prop Data is an internet marketing company solely focused on marketing real estate on the internet. They help generate leads and grow real estate businesses online.
Key services
Real estate data exchange, Property listing management, Digital marketing solutions, Custom branded websites, Lead generation, Real-time insights and reporting, Educational courses and webinars
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Video, Lottie animations, FontAwesome
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Privacy consent mechanisms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of sandboxed iframes for videos

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is a critical concern
  4. Strong branding and client trust signals present
  5. Good privacy and cookie compliance
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  7. Multiple external trusted marketing and analytics integrations
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Lottie for animations. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot's own analytics suite. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed achievable by optimizing third-party scripts. Accessibility is basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. The technical infrastructure is robust and supports the business goals effectively, though ongoing maintenance and modernization are recommended to mitigate technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with propdata.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review propdata.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.