Skip to main content

Security report for promet-split.hr

Promet d.o.o. · Transportation · Croatia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Promet d.o.o. is a municipal public transportation company based in Split, Croatia, providing city and suburban passenger transport services. The company operates primarily within the Split agglomeration, serving local residents and visitors. The website reflects a medium-sized municipal entity with a focus on transportation services. The business model is centered on public transit organization and operation, positioning Promet d.o.o. as a key local transport provider. Technically, the website is built on the DNN (DotNetNuke) CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and related libraries for frontend functionality. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic monitoring. The site is served over HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, indicating a secure connection. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are adequately implemented, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies such as privacy, cookie, or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data confirms a consistent and legitimate domain registration aligned with the company's municipal nature. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but has compliance gaps regarding privacy and cookie policies and lacks transparency on security incident handling. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's security posture and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching promet-split.hr

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Promet d.o.o. operates as a municipal transportation company serving the city of Split and its surrounding areas. Its market position is that of a local public transit operator, likely funded or overseen by municipal authorities. The company’s key services include organizing and operating urban and suburban bus transport. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on public mobility solutions rather than commercial sales. The target customer segment includes daily commuters, residents, and tourists in the Split region. The company benefits from a long-established presence since 2001, indicating stability and local trust. The website does not reveal partnerships or subsidiaries, suggesting a focused operational scope. The use of Google Analytics indicates an interest in monitoring user engagement and improving service delivery. The absence of social media links may indicate a traditional communication approach or limited digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. The absence of published privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. The use of Google Analytics is standard but requires proper privacy disclosures to comply with GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a municipal service website but would benefit from enhanced policy publication and technical security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy, including security contact information.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider adding verified company contact emails and social media links to improve user trust and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Promet d.o.o.
Description
Promet Split d.o.o., splitska gradska tvrtka s djelatnošću organiziranja gradskog i prigradskog prometa, odnosno prijevoza putnika na području grada Splita i splitske aglomeracije.
Key services
Organization of city and suburban passenger transport, Public bus transportation in Split and Split agglomeration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, EasyDNNnews, 2sxc, Google Analytics
Frameworks
DNN (DotNetNuke)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal public transport company site for Split, Croatia.
  2. Content is in Croatian language and targeted at local users.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  5. No visible security or phishing issues.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is long-established.
  7. Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in provided content.
  9. Contact information includes phone and contact forms but no explicit emails found.
  10. No security.txt or incident response info published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the DNN CMS platform, leveraging jQuery, jQuery UI, and EasyDNNnews modules for content and interactive features. The presence of 2sxc API scripts indicates use of modern content management extensions. Google Analytics is integrated asynchronously for performance. The site uses custom fonts loaded from external sources. The hosting appears to be stable and likely local or academic (CARNET registrar and Croatian nameservers). Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. SEO is supported by meta description and robots tags. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but explicit accessibility and security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with promet-split.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review promet-split.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.