Skip to main content

Security report for prokapital.com

Pro Kapital Eesti AS · Real Estate · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pro Kapital Eesti AS operates as a leading real estate development company in the Baltic States, with a history dating back to 1994. The company focuses on developing residential and business quarters, emphasizing timeless design and quality. It is publicly listed on the Tallinn Stock Exchange, indicating a medium-sized enterprise with a solid market position. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress, incorporating modern tracking and consent management tools. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that requires further verification to confirm domain legitimacy. Overall, the company demonstrates a credible business model with clear contact information and a well-structured website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prokapital.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets real estate investors and property buyers in Estonia and neighboring Baltic countries. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence and listing on the stock exchange. Revenue streams likely include property development sales and leasing. The website supports multiple languages, indicating a regional focus. The use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel suggests active marketing and retargeting efforts. The lack of visible social media links may limit broader engagement. The company’s ecosystem appears focused on direct investor relations and project showcases. Strategic growth is supported by ongoing and planned developments totaling significant square meters.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner, aligning with basic GDPR compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No forms on the homepage reduce attack surface but also limit direct data collection. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking and potential privacy concerns. The missing WHOIS data is a critical concern for domain trustworthiness and should be investigated. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, indicating limited transparency in security operations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options).
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  3. Verify and correct WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide social media engagement links.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pro Kapital Eesti AS
Registration number
10672309
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pro Kapital Eesti AS
Description
AS Pro Kapital Grupp is one of the oldest and leading real estate development companies in the Baltic States. They develop timelessly distinctive buildings with impeccable quality anticipating people’s needs and expectations.
Key services
Residential quarters development, Business quarters development, Real estate investment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
WPML (WordPress Multilingual CMS)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, YouTube Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to real estate development.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the homepage HTML.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is suspicious.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Website uses modern technologies and tracking tools including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML source.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage for direct data collection.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the homepage HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.2 with WPML for multilingual support, using jQuery and modern CSS. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. CookieYes manages cookie consent, indicating compliance efforts. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses a responsive design with mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no major errors detected. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a corporate real estate site but could benefit from enhanced security and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prokapital.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prokapital.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.