Skip to main content

Security report for projektdoma.cz

Projekt Doma · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Projekt Doma is a Czech charitable initiative focused on raising funds through the sale of a photographic calendar featuring intimate portraits of famous personalities in their homes. The proceeds support nonprofit organizations Cesta domů and Arkadie, which provide hospice and disability care services. The website is well-branded, professionally designed, and targets a general Czech audience interested in charity and cultural projects. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, and it uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the Czech Republic location and the project's founding date in 2021. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching projektdoma.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention projektdoma.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for projektdoma.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the non-profit sector with a niche focus on hospice and disability care fundraising through cultural engagement. Its business model relies on calendar sales to generate donations. The project has a small organizational size and a clear target audience within the Czech Republic. Partnerships include nonprofit organizations and a web development company. Media coverage and social media presence enhance its market position and trustworthiness. Growth potential lies in expanding calendar sales and awareness. The project demonstrates a focused charitable mission with consistent branding and good content quality.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but could be enhanced by adopting formal policies and additional technical controls to mitigate risks and improve compliance with GDPR and related regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add explicit HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response process and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with EU cookie regulations.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Projekt Doma
Description
Projekt Doma is a charitable initiative offering a calendar featuring intimate portraits of famous personalities in their homes. The proceeds support nonprofit organizations Cesta domů and Arkadie, which provide hospice and disability care services respectively.
Key services
Charitable calendar sales, Support for hospice and disability care organizations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, UIkit framework, Leica M9 camera (photography context)
Frameworks
WordPress, UIkit
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and reCAPTCHA)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a charity project supporting hospice and disability care organizations.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targets Czech audience.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and security plugins.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form available.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and organization info.
  10. No advertising networks or extensive tracking detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, using Yoast SEO for search optimization and Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA v3 for secure form handling. The UIkit framework is used for frontend components. Hosting is likely provided by WEDOS, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Structured data in JSON-LD format is implemented for SEO and organization information. The site lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but can benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with projektdoma.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review projektdoma.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.