Skip to main content

Security report for projekt23.cz

PROJEKT 23 · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PROJEKT 23 is a Czech non-profit initiative focused on crime prevention, social issues such as bullying, drugs, domestic violence, and providing support through storytelling, videos, and an assistance helpline. The project operates independently without corporate or institutional funding and collaborates with governmental and non-governmental organizations. Their key services include a YouTube channel, educational lectures, crime prevention projects, and an assistance hotline. The website demonstrates a consistent brand and professional content aimed at a general audience interested in social welfare and prevention. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including optimized YouTube embeds and FontAwesome icons, with good mobile responsiveness and SEO practices. However, no privacy or cookie policies were found, and WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, limiting trust assessment. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not provided, but HTTPS usage is implied. Overall, the site is credible and trustworthy based on content and partnerships, though improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching projekt23.cz

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention projekt23.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for projekt23.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project positions itself as an independent social awareness and support platform in the Czech Republic, targeting youth and adults affected by crime and social problems. Its competitive advantage lies in authentic storytelling, collaboration with official institutions like the Prison Service and Police, and a multi-channel digital presence including YouTube and podcasts. Revenue streams appear limited or non-commercial, focusing on voluntary work and donations via an online shop. The partnership ecosystem is strong with multiple NGOs and governmental bodies, enhancing credibility and outreach. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and diverse content formats. The business model emphasizes education, prevention, and social support rather than profit, aligning with non-profit sector norms.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible forms or user input fields, reducing attack vectors. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of third-party tracking (Metricool) introduces moderate user tracking but no explicit privacy controls were found. The site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, publishing a security policy, and enhancing privacy compliance to align with GDPR and best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to ensure no vulnerable libraries or misconfigurations exist and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PROJEKT 23
Description
Nezávislý projekt o prevenci kriminality, závislostí a násilí. Skutečné příběhy, videa a linka pomoci.
Key services
YouTube channel with videos, Crime prevention cooperation, Lectures for schools and public, Assistance helpline
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (w3.css, custom styles), JavaScript, FontAwesome icons, liteYT (YouTube embed optimization)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to collect user input
  • Use of HTTPS implied by og:url https://www.projekt23.cz

Analytics and tracking

Services
Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
metricool.com
Marketing tools
Metricool tracking script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No forms or user input fields detected, reducing attack surface.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  4. Strong presence on multiple social media platforms.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  6. Use of modern embed technology for YouTube videos (liteYT).
  7. Partner logos and links to official organizations enhance credibility.
  8. Contact information clearly provided in footer with emails and phone numbers.
  9. No security headers information available from provided data.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a clean HTML5 structure with external CSS including w3.css and custom styles, and JavaScript for UI interactions and YouTube video embedding via liteYT. FontAwesome icons are used extensively for UI elements. The site is mobile responsive with clear navigation and consistent branding. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies such as Metricool tracking. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with structured data, improved accessibility, and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with projekt23.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review projekt23.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.