Skip to main content

Security report for projecttogether.org

ProjectTogether · Non-profit · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProjectTogether is a German non-profit organization established in 2012 that aims to bring together society, politics, and economy for collaborative social impact. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a modern WordPress CMS using Elementor and Astra theme, integrated with marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, MailerLite, and Usercentrics for cookie consent. The organization maintains active social media channels on Facebook, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn, enhancing its community engagement and trustworthiness. Technically, the site is well-structured with good SEO and mobile optimization, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration transparency, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding additional security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which should be addressed to meet GDPR standards fully. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, serving its non-profit mission effectively.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 75 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching projecttogether.org

This scan found 12 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
Average
85
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention projecttogether.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for projecttogether.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProjectTogether operates in the non-profit sector focusing on social collaboration and community building. Its business model revolves around facilitating joint actions among societal stakeholders, political entities, and economic actors. The organization benefits from a well-established domain and consistent branding, positioning itself as a credible player in the German non-profit landscape. Revenue streams are likely based on donations, partnerships, and grants, though not explicitly stated. The target audience includes socially conscious individuals, policymakers, and businesses interested in collaborative social initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with marketing and analytics platforms, enhancing outreach and engagement. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen compliance and security transparency to further build stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain registration transparency. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate gaps in security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the site could benefit from implementing additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. The use of Usercentrics for cookie consent shows attention to privacy compliance, though the lack of a detailed privacy policy is a compliance gap. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the public content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but has room for improvement to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure channel.
  4. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProjectTogether
Description
ProjectTogether ist eine gemeinnützige Organisation, die Gesellschaft, Politik und Wirtschaft in das gemeinsame Handeln bringt.
Key services
community building, collaboration facilitation, social impact projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, HubSpot, MailerLite, Usercentrics, Fathom Analytics
Frameworks
Astra Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Usercentrics for cookie consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Fathom Analytics, MailerLite
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Fathom Analytics, MailerLite
Marketing tools
HubSpot, MailerLite, Usercentrics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German non-profit organization focused on social collaboration
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Astra theme
  3. Implements cookie consent via Usercentrics
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  5. Active social media presence on Facebook, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  7. Domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  10. Security could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It integrates multiple third-party services including HubSpot for marketing automation, MailerLite for email campaigns, Usercentrics for cookie consent management, and Fathom Analytics for privacy-focused analytics. The hosting and DNS are managed via InterNetX GmbH and raidboxes.net respectively, suggesting reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though some CSS and JavaScript could be optimized further. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata effectively for SEO and social media integration. Technical risks include the absence of DNSSEC and incomplete security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with projecttogether.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review projecttogether.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.