Skip to main content

Security report for preventionsuicide.be

Centre de prévention du suicide · Non-profit · Belgium

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Centre de Prévention du Suicide is a Belgian non-profit organization dedicated to suicide prevention and support for individuals in crisis, their relatives, and professionals. The website provides comprehensive resources including helpline services, psychological consultations, bereavement support, training, and community interventions. It is recognized by the COCOF authority, indicating a trusted position in the local mental health sector. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with modern libraries such as jQuery and GSAP, and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and policies could be improved. WHOIS data is restricted due to registry privacy policies, but the domain and website content align with a legitimate non-profit entity. Overall, the site is professional, accessible, and trustworthy, serving an important social function.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching preventionsuicide.be

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on mental health and suicide prevention in Belgium. It leverages digital channels including a website, social media, podcasts, and webinars to reach its audience. The business model is service-oriented, funded likely through donations and public support, with a clear call to action for donations and volunteer engagement. The partnership with Koalect for donation processing and accreditation by COCOF enhance credibility. The target audience includes individuals with suicidal thoughts, those bereaved by suicide, concerned relatives, and professionals seeking guidance. The website's content quality and navigation support effective outreach and community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be a gap in transparency. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor weakness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified given the sensitive nature of the organization's work. Overall, the security maturity is appropriate for a non-profit but could be enhanced with published policies and additional headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy page to increase transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish incident response contact information or a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures by providing a dedicated privacy policy page with detailed GDPR information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centre de prévention du suicide
Description
Le Centre de Prévention du Suicide propose à chaque étape du processus suicidaire une écoute active permettant aux personnes en crise d’exprimer leur(s) souffrance(s), de clarifier leur situation, de prendre du recul et d’ouvrir d’autres possibles.
Key services
Ligne d'écoute (helpline), Psychological consultations for suicidal crisis, Support for bereavement after suicide, Training and awareness sessions, Community interventions after suicide attempts, Support for psycho-medico-social sector, Online resources and library, Podcast and webinars
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, GSAP, Google Tag Manager, eu_cookie_compliance module
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available due to registry privacy restrictions
  3. Professional and consistent branding with clear trust signals
  4. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms implemented
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  6. No visible vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations in HTML content
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Drupal)
  8. Active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  9. Contact information clearly displayed including email and phone
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, using modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and GSAP for animations and UI enhancements. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, integrated with a cookie consent module to comply with GDPR. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for accessibility with clear navigation and semantic HTML. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on CDN-hosted libraries. No hosting provider details were detected from the HTML. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, suitable for the organization's needs, though some security best practices could be further implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with preventionsuicide.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review preventionsuicide.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.