Skip to main content

Security report for premator.com

Premator AB · Transportation · Sweden

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Premator AB is a Swedish company specializing in blasting and painting services primarily for the marine and industrial sectors. Established in 1976, the company has positioned itself as a key player in ship repair and new building markets, offering a wide range of services including tank coating, water blasting, branding, and stress-oriented protection. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting marine industry clients requiring high-quality blasting and coating solutions. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with UIkit framework, integrating Google Analytics and Google Maps API for enhanced user experience and analytics. Privacy compliance is well managed through Iubenda, providing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with a consent mechanism. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers and incident response policies could enhance their security maturity. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and trustworthy, supporting Premator's business credibility and market presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching premator.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
50
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
48
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Premator operates in the transportation and energy sectors, focusing on marine vessel maintenance and industrial blasting services. Their business model revolves around service provision to shipyards, shipping companies, and industrial clients. The company leverages its long history and specialized expertise to maintain a strong market position. Their digital presence includes active LinkedIn engagement and compliance with privacy regulations, indicating a mature approach to customer engagement and regulatory adherence. The absence of terms of service and incident response policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and risk management. No subsidiaries or parent companies are indicated, suggesting an independent medium-sized enterprise. The company’s website content and technical infrastructure support their operational goals effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. The use of Iubenda for cookie consent reflects awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the lack of advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact details indicate room for improvement in security best practices and transparency. No vulnerable libraries or forms with insecure inputs were detected. The overall security score is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and publicly available security policies. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, ensuring accessibility but also requiring proactive security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Develop and publish incident response and security policies to demonstrate preparedness and build trust with clients.
  4. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user and client obligations and legal protections.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced and maintain compliance with evolving privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Premator AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Premator AB
Description
Blasting and painting services in the marine and industrial sectors.
Key services
New building, Ship repair, Water blasting, Premator at sea, Tank coating, Tank cleaning, Branding, Stress-oriented protection, Fujairah anchorage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Iubenda cookie consent, Google Maps API
Frameworks
UIkit (CSS/JS framework)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (base href uses https)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Iubenda cookie consent
Marketing tools
LinkedIn
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on marine and industrial blasting and painting services.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance using Iubenda.
  4. No visible security or privacy policy documents beyond privacy and cookie policies.
  5. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented in footer.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage for direct data collection.
  8. Use of Joomla CMS and UIkit framework.
  9. Google Analytics and Google Maps API used for analytics and mapping.
  10. LinkedIn social media presence actively promoted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS, utilizing the UIkit framework for responsive design and user interface components. Integration with Google Analytics and Google Maps API enhances functionality and user engagement. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with caching and optimization scripts in place. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated security headers and enhanced accessibility features. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with premator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review premator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.