Pension Real Estate Association · Real Estate · United States
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
The Pension Real Estate Association (PREA) is a well-established non-profit trade association serving the global institutional real estate investment industry. It caters primarily to institutional investors such as pension funds, endowments, foundations, insurance companies, and investment advisory firms. PREA offers a comprehensive suite of services including industry research, conferences, publications, webinars, and awards programs, positioning itself as a key resource and networking hub within the real estate investment sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with rich, relevant content targeted at its institutional audience. Technically, the website is built on Mura CMS 7.0 and leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for security. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO and accessibility features, though some accessibility improvements could be made. Performance is moderate, and the site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and use of CAPTCHA on forms. However, the absence of security headers and a cookie consent mechanism indicates room for improvement in compliance and security hardening. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, though the professional presentation and industry presence support legitimacy. Overall, the site maintains a solid security posture but should enhance privacy compliance and security headers to strengthen trust. The overall risk assessment is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding cookie consent for GDPR compliance, publishing security policies, and conducting regular security audits. These steps will enhance the site's security posture, compliance, and user trust, supporting PREA's role as a trusted industry association.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention prea.org, from OffSeq Breach.
3 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for prea.org.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with prea.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prea.org.