Skip to main content

Security report for praguevisitorpass.eu

WEDOS Internet, a.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Prague Visitor Pass website serves as the official platform for purchasing and managing city visitor passes that provide unlimited public transport and discounted access to numerous experiences in Prague. The business targets tourists and visitors seeking convenience and cost savings during their stay. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, mobile optimization, and integration with a mobile app, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with Kentico CMS, using jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality. While the site performs moderately well, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements CSRF tokens and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure policies. WHOIS data indicates the domain is registered with a reputable Czech hosting provider, consistent with the business location and nature. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could benefit from enhanced security hardening and clearer contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching praguevisitorpass.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
55
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Prague Visitor Pass operates in the transportation and tourism sectors, offering a city card product that bundles public transport access with cultural and leisure experiences. Its business model is e-commerce focused, selling passes online and via a mobile app. The company leverages partnerships with city authorities and cultural institutions, as evidenced by official logos and social media links. The target market is international and local tourists, with pricing tiers for adults, students, and children. The site’s market position is that of an official city card provider, which supports its credibility. Revenue streams primarily come from pass sales. The company appears small but well-integrated into Prague’s tourism ecosystem. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The site’s content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a positive user experience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, which are positive indicators. A cookie consent banner is present, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are found, which limits transparency for security researchers. The technology stack includes some legacy components (ASP.NET WebForms), which may require ongoing maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response contact information is not provided. Overall, the site is secure enough for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
  4. Add clear company contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve trust and customer service.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WEDOS Internet, a.s.
Description
Official website for the Prague Visitor Pass, offering city cards that provide unlimited public transport and discounted or free access to over 70 experiences in Prague.
Key services
Sale of Prague Visitor Passes (48, 72, 120 hours), Mobile app for pass management, Access to public transport and city experiences, Guided tours and river cruises
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap 4, RequireJS (commented out), ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Use of HTTPS implied by domain and resources
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Floodlight (DoubleClick)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and e-commerce functionality.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliance is indicated.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  5. Use of ASP.NET WebForms and Kentico CMS suggests a mature but somewhat legacy technology stack.
  6. Social media links point to official city accounts, enhancing trust.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source; potential area for improvement.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain registered via a reputable Czech hosting provider without privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature but somewhat legacy technology stack featuring ASP.NET WebForms and Kentico CMS, with frontend technologies including jQuery 3.4.1 and Bootstrap 4. The site loads resources efficiently with preloading of fonts and images, and includes mobile optimization scripts and responsive design elements. The presence of CSRF tokens and form validation scripts indicates attention to secure form handling. However, some scripts like RequireJS are commented out, suggesting partial or legacy code usage. The site performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. SEO is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could be modernized and optimized further for performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with praguevisitorpass.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review praguevisitorpass.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.