Skip to main content

Security report for polyroad.lv

Polyroad · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Polyroad is a Latvian civil engineering company specializing in road, street, and parking lot design, with over 20 years of experience delivering complex infrastructure projects. The company targets private and public sector clients requiring professional engineering and project expertise. Their website is built on WordPress using Elementor, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Contact information is transparent, including email, phone, and physical address. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, and no WHOIS data was retrievable, limiting domain trust verification. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers and no visible vulnerabilities, but improvements are recommended. Overall, the site reflects a legitimate small business with a focused service offering in transportation infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching polyroad.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention polyroad.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for polyroad.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Polyroad operates in the transportation sector, providing essential engineering services such as road design, surveying, and project expertise. Their market position is supported by client testimonials from Latvian governmental bodies and a portfolio of significant projects. The business model is service-oriented, targeting infrastructure development clients. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting credibility. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company leverages common web technologies but lacks advanced marketing or analytics tools. The absence of privacy and security policies suggests room for compliance improvement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and standard WordPress security practices but lacks explicit security headers like CSP or HSTS. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The contact form includes validation but no advanced anti-bot or WAF protections are detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates GDPR compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and regularly updated.
  4. Publish vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Polyroad
Description
Polyroad is a company specializing in road, street, and parking lot design, offering engineering services to ensure projects are feasible and successfully implemented. They provide services including road design, surveying, construction project expertise, connection and parking lot design, author supervision, and drainage system design.
Key services
Road design, Surveying, Construction project expertise, Parking lot and connection design, Author supervision, Drainage system design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Font Awesome, Simple Line Icons, Magnific Popup, Slick Carousel, OceanWP Theme
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • Contact form with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  4. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and common plugins
  5. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and Elementor scripts
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, using common libraries like jQuery and Font Awesome. The technical implementation is modern but basic, with no advanced analytics or tracking detected. Performance is moderate with standard plugin usage. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site is hosted on an unknown provider with no visible CDN or performance enhancements. Technical debt appears low but security and compliance technical gaps exist.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with polyroad.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review polyroad.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.