Skip to main content

Security report for polagra.pl

Międzynarodowe Targi Poznańskie (MTP) · Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

POLAGRA is a well-established trade fair event focused on the food industry and HoReCa sector in Poland, organized by Międzynarodowe Targi Poznańskie (MTP). The website provides comprehensive information about the event, exhibitor offers, visitor details, and related services. The site is professionally designed with good navigation, mobile optimization, and consistent branding. Technically, it uses AngularJS and integrates Google marketing and analytics tools, hosted by OVH SAS. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit security policies are missing. WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and long history. No adult or questionable content is present, making it safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching polagra.pl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a major event organizer in the food and hospitality sectors, targeting industry professionals, exhibitors, and visitors. It leverages partnerships with MTP and related platforms to provide exhibitor services and event management. The business model centers on trade fair organization, exhibitor engagement, and visitor services, supported by advertising and promotional offerings. The extensive list of linked partner domains indicates a broad ecosystem of industry participants and service providers. The company holds a strong market position in Poland with a large-scale event and a well-known brand.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed via Google Consent API. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be strengthened.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Międzynarodowe Targi Poznańskie (MTP)
Description
POLAGRA is the largest trade fair for the food industry and HoReCa sector in Poland, showcasing food products, new technologies, and solutions for gastronomy and accommodation facilities, promoting Polish food abroad.
Key services
Trade fair organization, Exhibitor services, Visitor information and ticketing, Advertising and promotional services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-app), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event site for POLAGRA trade fair in Poland.
  2. Content is rich with detailed event, exhibitor, and visitor information.
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  4. HTTPS is enabled and used site-wide.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with Google Consent API.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is long-established and registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. No security policy or incident response contact explicitly published on site.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers visible in provided content.
  10. Site uses AngularJS and Google marketing/analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses AngularJS framework and integrates multiple Google marketing and analytics scripts, indicating a modern albeit somewhat legacy JavaScript framework usage. The hosting provider is OVH SAS, a reputable European hosting company. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features such as WCAG toggles for zoom and contrast. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich content and multiple external scripts. The site does not appear to use a common CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include potential outdated AngularJS usage and missing advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with polagra.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review polagra.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.