Skip to main content

Security report for poissonneriedeshalles.fr

Poissonnerie des Halles · Retail · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Poissonnerie des Halles is a small local business based in Reims, France, specializing in seafood retail and restaurant services. The website promotes their fish, shellfish, and crustacean sales alongside dining options and event catering. The business also highlights partnerships with related entities such as L'Etal, Le Bocal restaurant, Le Triporteur mobile restaurant, and La Maison d'Oléron vacation rental, indicating a diversified local ecosystem. The website content is well structured, professionally designed, and targets local customers and visitors interested in seafood and dining experiences. Technically, the website uses a modern but basic technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome Pro, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with no major technical issues detected. Accessibility is basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which reduces compliance with GDPR and best practices. No forms or user data collection mechanisms are present, minimizing attack surface but also limiting engagement. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the site is fully accessible. Overall, the website is a good representation of a small local seafood business with moderate technical maturity but with room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and domain legitimacy verification. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, verifying domain registration, and enhancing trust signals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching poissonneriedeshalles.fr

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention poissonneriedeshalles.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for poissonneriedeshalles.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Poissonnerie des Halles operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, focusing on seafood sales and restaurant services in Reims. Their business model combines direct retail with dining and event catering, supported by partnerships with complementary local businesses. This ecosystem approach strengthens their market position locally. The absence of detailed company registration or founding year limits deeper business intelligence. The website's professional presentation and clear contact information support credibility. Growth opportunities may lie in expanding digital presence and compliance to build customer trust further.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with no detected HTTPS enforcement or security headers visible in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The lack of forms reduces risk exposure but also limits user interaction. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement standard security headers, privacy policies, and verify domain registration status to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with valid SSL certificates to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Verify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is complete and accurate.
  5. Establish incident response contact channels and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Poissonnerie des Halles
Description
Poissonnerie vente de poissons, coquillages et crustacés. Restaurant de poissons et fruits de mer
Key services
Seafood retail sales, Restaurant dining, Event catering, Vacation rental promotion (partner)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome Pro 5, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information limited to phone and physical address, no email contact found
  4. No forms present on the site to collect user data
  5. No social media links detected
  6. Technical stack is modern but basic
  7. No explicit security headers or policies detected
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  9. Website content is relevant and professional for a local seafood business
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technical stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with no major issues. Accessibility is basic but functional. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by adding security headers, optimizing accessibility, and possibly adopting a CMS for easier content management and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with poissonneriedeshalles.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review poissonneriedeshalles.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.