Skip to main content

Security report for podbrnensko.cz

MAS Podbrněnsko, spolek · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MAS Podbrněnsko, spolek is a regional non-profit organization focused on supporting the development of the Pohořelicko and Židlochovicko regions in the Czech Republic. The organization provides services such as grant and subsidy information, project support, promotion of local producers, and shared office facilities. Their target audience includes local communities, small and medium enterprises, and non-profit organizations. The website reflects a professional and community-oriented business model with a clear regional focus. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Foundation framework, bxSlider, and Google Analytics. It is built on the Nette Framework CMS and shows good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. The site includes cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. However, some security best practices such as security headers are not visibly implemented. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and has implemented cookie consent banners, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, which introduces moderate risk. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and safe for general audiences. Strategically, MAS Podbrněnsko should enhance its security posture by adding security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, and ensuring regular updates of third-party libraries. Improving accessibility and SEO would also benefit user experience and reach.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching podbrnensko.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MAS Podbrněnsko operates as a small-sized non-profit entity serving specific Czech regional communities. Its competitive advantage lies in its local focus and comprehensive support for regional development projects and local producers. The business model is centered on community engagement, grant facilitation, and regional promotion rather than commercial revenue streams. The organization maintains partnerships with entities like NSMAS, enhancing its network and influence. Growth indicators include active project databases and event calendars. The website content and structure support transparency and community trust, although domain registration opacity is a concern.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of visible security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were found in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are missing, which could delay mitigation of security incidents. Overall, the security culture appears basic but could be improved with formal policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MAS Podbrněnsko, spolek
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MAS Podbrněnsko, spolek
Description
Sdružení občanů, neziskových organizací, podnikatelů a obcí regionů Pohořelicko a Židlochovicko, zaměřené na zvelebení regionů, podporu malých a středních podnikatelů a neziskových subjektů.
Key services
Grant and subsidy information, Project support and realization, Local producer promotion, Shared office services, Event calendar
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation framework, bxSlider, fancybox, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, cookieconsent.js
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy present, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. Contact information is clear and includes named contact person.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. Use of common JS libraries and frameworks for UI and analytics.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Nette Framework CMS with a frontend powered by Foundation framework, jQuery, bxSlider, and fancybox. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses a cookie consent library from freeprivacypolicy.com. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. The HTML structure is valid with meta tags for viewport and charset. However, no advanced SEO structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) was detected. Accessibility features are basic, and no advanced performance optimization techniques were observed. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with podbrnensko.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review podbrnensko.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.