Skip to main content

Security report for pocmanagement.co.uk

POC Management · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

POC Management is a UK-based specialist security, technology, and investigation service provider with over 16 years of experience. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including asset protection, investigations, technology solutions, and intelligence management. They hold multiple industry certifications such as SIA Approved Contractor Scheme (ACS), SSAIB, RISQS, SafeContractor, and ISO 9001, positioning them as a trusted provider in the security sector. Their clientele includes globally recognized brands, underscoring their market credibility and expertise. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and Finsweet CMS Slider. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with fast loading times and a professional design. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance features such as cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. No vulnerable libraries or security flaws were detected in the content. The absence of security headers and incident response contact information are notable gaps. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or invalid, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional website and business presence. Overall, POC Management presents a strong business and technical profile with a solid security posture but should address privacy compliance and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pocmanagement.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

POC Management operates in the security and investigations sector, targeting businesses requiring specialist protection and intelligence services. Their market position is strong, evidenced by top-tier industry certifications and a client base including major global companies. The business model focuses on providing tailored security operatives, investigative services, advanced technology solutions, and intelligence frameworks. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts and bespoke security solutions. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website, active social media presence, and multiple case studies showcasing successful projects. The partnership ecosystem includes industry bodies and certification organizations, enhancing credibility. Strategic observations suggest the company is well-positioned in the UK security market but should clarify domain registration details to avoid trust issues.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of modern web technologies reduces risk from outdated components. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents a missed opportunity to harden defenses. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism detected. The invalid WHOIS data is a significant concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues that could affect business continuity and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced headers, privacy features, and domain registration clarity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response plan or security contact page to improve trust and readiness for security events.
  4. Verify and update domain registration details to ensure WHOIS data accuracy and reduce legitimacy concerns.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
POC Management
Description
Expert security, investigations, and intelligence solutions. SIA-accredited with 16+ years protecting people, assets, and operations for leading brands.
Key services
Asset Protection, Investigations, Technology Services, Intelligence Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Finsweet CMS Slider
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or invalid, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  4. Strong presence of industry certifications and client testimonials.
  5. No cookie policy or consent mechanism found, which is a privacy compliance gap.
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response contact information.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented in footer.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as jQuery and Finsweet CMS Slider for enhanced user experience. Hosting is provided via Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast content delivery and good uptime. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features like focus-visible outlines and semantic HTML. Meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards) are properly implemented. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. Performance is fast with optimized images and video backgrounds. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and privacy compliance features are areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant web presence aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pocmanagement.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pocmanagement.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.