Skip to main content

Security report for plusssz.pl

Plusssz · Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plusssz is a Polish vitamin supplement brand offering products that cover 100% of daily vitamin requirements with a focus on natural ingredients and no added sugar. The website positions the brand as an innovative leader in the vitamin complex market in Poland, targeting general consumers interested in health and wellness. The site is built on WordPress with popular plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and performance optimization. Structured data and metadata are well implemented, supporting good SEO and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some best practices, but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. Contact information is not explicitly presented in the analyzed content, which may affect user trust and compliance. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plusssz.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention plusssz.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for plusssz.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector focusing on health supplements, leveraging e-commerce and digital marketing to reach consumers. The multilingual site indicates an intent to serve both Polish and English-speaking audiences. The use of Rank Math SEO and Google Tag Manager suggests active marketing and analytics strategies. The company appears medium-sized with a history dating back to 2014, consistent with domain registration. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The brand emphasizes product quality, natural ingredients, and comprehensive vitamin coverage, positioning itself competitively in the Polish market.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Client-side JavaScript error logging and lazy loading scripts indicate attention to performance and error handling. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the security posture. No explicit incident response or security policy pages are found, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers to HTTP responses to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to enhance compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plusssz
Description
Plusssz offers vitamin complexes covering 100% of daily vitamin requirements, without added sugar, with fruit juice powder, supporting energy, concentration, hydration, and immunity.
Key services
Vitamin complex products, Product information and promotion, Multilingual website (Polish and English)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Revolution Slider, WP Rocket, Rank Math SEO, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Lazy loading scripts
  • Error logging with client-side JS error capture and reporting

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a commercial vitamin supplement brand site in Polish with English alternate.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with popular plugins and SEO tools.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata.
  6. No signs of adult or suspicious content.
  7. Security practices could be improved with better headers and policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider for content management and presentation. It uses jQuery and modern lazy loading techniques for performance optimization. SEO is managed via Rank Math plugin, and multilingual support is provided by WPML. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and Typekit. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, but some technical debt exists in missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plusssz.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plusssz.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.