Skip to main content

Security report for plastikati.lv

PLASTIKATI.lv · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PLASTIKATI.lv is a Latvian-based e-commerce retailer specializing in plastic products, greenhouses, garden supplies, construction materials, and related outdoor equipment. The website offers a comprehensive product catalog with multi-language support targeting consumers and businesses in Latvia and nearby regions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and responsive design, providing a good user experience and moderate performance. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. Security practices are partially implemented with HTTPS and CSRF tokens, but lack of security headers and privacy policies indicate room for improvement. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer business contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plastikati.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on plastic and garden-related products, serving a niche market in Latvia. Its business model is primarily e-commerce with a detailed product catalog and online shopping cart. The website demonstrates consistent branding and trust signals such as product labels and discounts. However, the lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may affect customer trust. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company appears to be a small-sized regional player with a focus on product variety and accessibility through multiple languages.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens and Google reCAPTCHA for form security, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy policy and incident response information suggests gaps in compliance and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy documentation, and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident reporting.
  4. Establish and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PLASTIKATI.lv
Description
Retailer specializing in plastic products, greenhouses, garden goods, lawn grids and borders, construction materials, tents and roofs, fences, and parking solutions.
Key services
Sale of polycarbonate sheets and accessories, Greenhouses and greenhouse accessories, Garden supplies including films, nets, and soil products, Construction materials and fasteners, Outdoor furniture and storage solutions, Fencing and parking equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, jQuery (implied by usage of $ in scripts), Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Google reCAPTCHA integrated on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich product catalog and multi-language support.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with visible CSS and likely functional consent.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Security best practices partially implemented (HTTPS, CSRF token, reCAPTCHA).
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
  8. No social media links or business certifications found in the HTML content.
  9. Website content is retail and safe for general audiences.
  10. Technical stack is modern but lacks explicit CMS or framework identification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Google reCAPTCHA. The presence of CSRF tokens indicates attention to form security. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and canonical links. However, no CMS or specific frameworks were identified, suggesting a custom or less common platform. Performance appears moderate with preloading of CSS assets. Accessibility features are basic but could be enhanced. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plastikati.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plastikati.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.