Skip to main content

Security report for planika.ba

Planika Flex d.o.o. · Retail · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Planika Flex d.o.o. operates planika.ba, an established online retail platform specializing in footwear and fashion accessories for women, men, and children. The company leverages a strong brand legacy of over 70 years, positioning itself as a trusted footwear provider in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The website offers a comprehensive catalog of products, including shoes, sneakers, sandals, boots, and related accessories, targeting a broad general audience. The business model is focused on e-commerce retail with a clear emphasis on brand variety and seasonal collections. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and responsive design frameworks likely based on Bootstrap. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, with structured data enhancing search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and technical SEO. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of security headers and lack of publicly available security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms highlight areas for enhancement. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks. Overall, planika.ba is a professionally managed e-commerce site with solid business credibility and technical foundation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency around security policies would strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching planika.ba

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Planika Flex d.o.o. holds a strong market position as a traditional footwear brand with over seven decades of history, now extended into online retail. The company targets a wide demographic including women, men, and children, offering a diverse product range from casual to formal footwear and accessories. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, supported by a multi-brand strategy featuring both local and international brands. The presence on multiple social media platforms supports marketing and customer engagement. The company appears to be medium-sized, operating primarily in the retail sector within Bosnia and Herzegovina. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The brand's longevity and comprehensive product offering provide competitive advantages in the regional footwear market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form practices such as CSRF tokens. However, the lack of security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts was found, indicating limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. The use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts introduces moderate user tracking but no explicit privacy controls were observed. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Planika Flex d.o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Planika Flex d.o.o.
Description
Online prodavanica obuće poznate robne marke sa tradicijom dugom preko 70 godina.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by classes and dropdowns)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Secure login form with password field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for footwear and accessories.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Multiple social media channels linked, enhancing trust and marketing reach.
  4. Secure login form with CSRF token present.
  5. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel.
  6. No visible security headers detected; improvement needed.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information available.
  8. Content is in Bosnian language targeting local and regional customers.
  9. Good mobile optimization and navigation structure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and responsive design likely based on Bootstrap. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site lacks visible CMS identification but appears custom or based on common e-commerce frameworks. Hosting details are not explicit. There is an opportunity to improve technical SEO, accessibility, and security header implementation to reduce technical debt and enhance user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with planika.ba. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planika.ba.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.