Skip to main content

Security report for pirotehnikascentrs.lv

Retail · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pirotehnikascentrs.lv is a Latvian retail website specializing in the sale of pyrotechnic products such as rockets, fireworks, batteries, petards, volcanoes, and fountains. The business appears to be a local market player focused on customers in Riga, Latvia. The website presents a professional design with clear navigation and contact information, including phone numbers, email, and a physical address. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in compliance with modern data protection standards. Technically, the site uses common web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Slider Revolution, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is average with no HTTPS verification visible in the provided data and no security headers detected, which suggests room for improvement in securing the site and protecting user data. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the site content and contact details appear consistent with a legitimate small retail business. Overall, the site is functional and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pirotehnikascentrs.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector focused on pyrotechnics in Riga, Latvia. It targets general consumers interested in purchasing fireworks and related products. The business model is direct retail with an online presence primarily for marketing and product showcasing rather than e-commerce transactions on the homepage. The company maintains a Facebook social media presence to engage customers. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The website content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a trustworthy local retail brand. However, the absence of formal policies and limited digital compliance may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence. The business could improve by formalizing privacy and security policies and expanding digital marketing and compliance efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing immediate risk of input-based vulnerabilities, but the use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces potential privacy concerns. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts to improve the security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish incident response contact information for security and abuse reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Pirotehnika. Labākā pirotethnika Rīgā. Visa veida pirotehnika - raķetes, salūti, baterejas, petardes, vulkāni un strūklakas.
Key services
sale of pyrotechnics, fireworks, rockets, batteries, petards, volcanoes, fountains
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Slider Revolution, Modernizr, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • No forms detected on homepage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on homepage; minimal data collection observed.
  5. Use of common third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Slider Revolution.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  8. Content is focused on retail pyrotechnics in Riga, Latvia.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected; content safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Slider Revolution for interactive sliders. The site loads external resources over HTTP and HTTPS, with some Google Fonts loaded over HTTP which may cause mixed content issues. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic with some semantic HTML but no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility features observed. SEO optimization is basic with meta description present but no Open Graph or structured data markup found. The site does not appear to use a CMS or known platform based on the HTML structure. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pirotehnikascentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pirotehnikascentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.