Skip to main content

Security report for piro.lv

Piro.lv · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Piro.lv is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in pyrotechnics and fireworks products, serving customers primarily in Riga, Baltezers, and Adazi. The business has been operating since 2011 and positions itself as a trusted local seller offering certified pyrotechnic products with competitive pricing. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Elementor for content management and SEO optimization. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports customer engagement. Technically, the site uses HTTPS with good security headers and modern web technologies, providing a moderate performance and good mobile experience. However, explicit privacy and cookie policies are missing, and no incident response or security policy information is provided, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional with moderate security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching piro.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on pyrotechnics, targeting general consumers interested in fireworks and related products. Its business model is direct online sales via an e-commerce platform, supplemented by physical store locations. The market position is that of a local trusted seller with a decade of experience. Key revenue streams are product sales of various pyrotechnic items including roman candles, rocket sets, and petards. The website supports multilingual content, indicating an intent to serve a broader audience including English and Russian speakers. The company demonstrates trust signals such as CE certification and clear contact phone numbers but lacks visible corporate registration or VAT information on the site. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Analytics and Gemius tracking, with basic advertising transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy, indicating a good baseline security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit privacy, cookie, and incident response policies suggests gaps in compliance and security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site uses common WordPress plugins which should be regularly updated to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding formal policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet broader user needs and compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Piro.lv
Description
Nopirkt pirotehniku Rīgā, Baltezerā, Ādažos. Pirotehniskie izstrādājumi, stobru bloks, petardes, uguns strūklaka, romiešu sveces, citi.
Key services
Sale of pyrotechnics, Fireworks, Petards, Roman candles, Rocket sets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, Elementor, jQuery, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Gemius
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Gemius
Tracking pixels
Gemius
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Site Kit by Google
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling pyrotechnics in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Russian).
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected explicitly.
  4. Contact phone number clearly displayed; no company email found in HTML.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and SEO plugins.
  7. No visible security or incident response policies.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The site loads multiple external resources including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Gemius analytics scripts. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate with some use of caching and asynchronous script loading. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic standards. No hosting provider information was found in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small to medium e-commerce business but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with piro.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review piro.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.