Skip to main content

Security report for pimpandhost.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PimpAndHost is a niche online platform providing free and premium image hosting and sharing services, primarily focused on adult content including pornographic images and related categories. The website offers users the ability to upload, share, and explore images, albums, and GIFs, with a business model that includes free anonymous usage and premium paid plans. The platform targets an adult audience and maintains a moderate market position within the adult image hosting niche. Technically, the site uses a custom CMS with Bootstrap framework, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and leverages Cloudflare for DNS services. The website is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and enhancing SSL/TLS configurations. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Contact information is limited to web forms without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the domain is aged and registered consistently, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pimpandhost.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
35
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pimpandhost.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,490
Employees
0
Customers
2,441
Third parties
49
Weak passwords
26%

15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pimpandhost.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in adult content image hosting and sharing. It leverages a freemium model to attract users with free uploads and encourages upgrades to premium plans for enhanced features. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its stability, speed, and premium support claims. The target customer segment is adults seeking free or paid image hosting for adult content. The company has a long-standing domain since 2006, indicating sustained operations. The presence of a dedicated forum subdomain suggests community engagement. However, the lack of explicit company contact details and certifications limits transparency. Advertising and marketing rely on Google Tag Manager, with no visible affiliate or retargeting programs. Strategic partnerships appear limited to the forum subdomain.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate with some best practices observed such as CSRF token usage and HTTPS implied but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are publicly documented, though an abuse contact page exists. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response plan to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance contact information availability with verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Free Image Hosting & Sharing For websites, blogs and forums. What makes us unique? Stability, Speed and premium Support. Sign Up for FREE!
Key services
image hosting, image sharing, upload images, submit posts, explore trending images, albums, gifs
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, YouTube Widget API, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free and premium image hosting service focused on adult content.
  2. No explicit privacy cookie banner or consent mechanism detected.
  3. No visible security headers in HTML content; DNSSEC not enabled.
  4. Uses Google Tag Manager and YouTube API for analytics and media embedding.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via web form only.
  6. Terms of Service and Privacy Policy pages are present and accessible.
  7. No visible security or vulnerability disclosure policies.
  8. Adult content is explicit and targeted to adults-only audience.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom content management system built with Bootstrap and JavaScript libraries including jQuery. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and YouTube API for media embedding. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, though no DNSSEC is enabled. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO with proper meta tags and responsive design. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires modernization to enhance security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pimpandhost.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pimpandhost.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.