Skip to main content

Security report for pikavuorot.fi

Aittakoodi Oy · Transportation · Finland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pikavuorot.fi is a Finnish transportation price comparison website operated by Aittakoodi Oy, founded in 2015. The platform aggregates and compares prices and schedules for bus and train travel across multiple Finnish transportation providers, including major companies such as VR, Matkahuolto, Onnibus, and airlines like Finnair and Norwegian. It serves a general audience seeking convenient travel planning and ticket purchasing options within Finland. The website enjoys a moderate market position as a leading price comparison tool in its niche. Technically, the site employs a modern but somewhat dated technology stack including Bootstrap 3, jQuery, DataTables, and Socket.io for real-time data updates. It integrates multiple third-party services for fonts, advertising, and analytics, including Google Adsense and Facebook SDK. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, HTTPS is used, but explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page present, but no detailed security or incident response policies are published. Contact information is limited to an email address, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, Pikavuorot.fi presents a trustworthy and functional service with room for improvement in security hardening, privacy transparency, and expanded contact options. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing comprehensive policies, and improving user trust signals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pikavuorot.fi

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pikavuorot.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pikavuorot.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pikavuorot.fi operates in the Finnish transportation sector as a price comparison and travel planning service. Its business model relies on aggregating ticket prices and schedules from multiple transport providers and directing users to purchase tickets via partner websites. The site targets Finnish travelers using public transport, including buses, trains, and flights. Partnerships with major transport companies and airlines strengthen its market position. The platform attracts over 30,000 monthly users, indicating a niche but steady user base. Revenue likely derives from affiliate referrals and advertising. The company maintains a focused ecosystem of partners and advertisers, with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies beyond Aittakoodi Oy. Growth opportunities include expanding service coverage and enhancing user engagement through improved UX and security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of detected security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for improvement. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks introduces some risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy, but lacks detailed incident response or security policies. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the site is functional and reasonably secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish detailed security and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Expand contact information to include phone and physical address to enhance business credibility.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing clear data retention policies and a dedicated GDPR compliance statement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aittakoodi Oy
Description
Pikavuorot.fi on Suomen kattavin linjaliikenteen hintavertailusivusto, joka vertailee eri yhtiöiden linja-auto- ja junalippujen hintoja yhdellä haulla. Palvelu listaa valitulle matkustuspäivälle kaikkien pikavuorojen- ja junalähtöjen aikataulut ja hinnat valittujen kaupunkien välille. Palvelusta voi siirtyä suoraan ostamaan matkalipun kyseisen yhtiön verkkokaupasta.
Key services
price comparison for bus and train tickets, schedule listings, direct links to ticket purchases
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3, DataTables, Moment.js, Google Fonts, Google Adsense, Facebook SDK, Socket.io
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel (via SDK)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Adform
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied by gtag.js), Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a comprehensive price comparison for Finnish bus and train travel.
  2. Uses multiple third-party scripts and ad networks, which may impact privacy.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. Contact information limited to email only; no phone or physical address found.
  5. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Website is well-branded and consistent with Finnish transportation sector.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap 3 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, DataTables for tabular data display, and Socket.io for real-time updates. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and advertising is managed via Google Adsense and Adform. Analytics are implemented using Google Analytics and Facebook SDK. The site is custom-built without a known CMS, indicating bespoke development. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in script loading and caching. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization to newer frameworks and improved security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pikavuorot.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pikavuorot.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.