Skip to main content

Security report for piggy.com

Piggyback Plus Inc. · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Piggyback Plus Inc. is a well-established transportation and logistics service provider specializing in rail containers, door-to-door shipping, special handling, transloads, and related freight services. With over 35 years of experience, the company targets businesses requiring efficient and cost-effective transportation solutions across the United States. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, emphasizing customer service and operational efficiency. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Flowbite CSS framework, and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with a legitimate business, with the domain being active since 2000. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy and security policies, which may pose compliance risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating room for improvement in security transparency. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response documentation would enhance the security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching piggy.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Piggyback Plus operates in the transportation sector, focusing on freight and logistics services. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence and comprehensive service offerings including rail containers, door-to-door delivery, and specialized handling. The business model is service-oriented, targeting commercial clients needing nationwide freight solutions. Revenue streams likely derive from transportation contracts and logistics management. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem with no publicly listed subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators include a modern website and active customer engagement through contact forms and newsletters. Strategic observations suggest a focus on customer service and operational efficiency to maintain market position.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and domain transfer restrictions, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies limits the overall security posture. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the lack of cookie consent and incident response contacts indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR and similar regulations. The use of Google Analytics without explicit consent may expose the company to privacy risks. Enhancing security transparency and implementing best practices would reduce potential business impact from security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy policies to reflect data collection and processing practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Piggyback Plus Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Piggyback Plus Inc.
Description
Piggyback Plus is a transportation service company specializing in rail containers, door to door shipping, special handling, transloads, nationwide service, custom trace reports, over the road, and less than a load (LTL) services. They focus on saving customers time and money by optimizing transportation needs.
Key services
Rail Containers, Door to Door, Special Handling, Transloads, Nationwide Service, Custom Trace Reports, Over the Road, Less Than a Load (LTL)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Flowbite CSS, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Flowbite
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear and multiple contact methods provided.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  5. Use of Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  6. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with Flowbite CSS framework and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. The domain is registered with Network Solutions and uses name servers from IPowerDNS/IPowerWeb, indicating a stable hosting environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could be addressed to improve resilience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with piggy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review piggy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.