Skip to main content

Security report for pierigaspartneriba.lv

Biedrība "Pierīgas partnerība" · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biedrība "Pierīgas partnerība" is a regional non-profit organization operating in the Pierīga area of Latvia, specifically serving the Mārupes and Olaines municipalities. The organization focuses on community strengthening, supporting local NGOs, entrepreneurs, and residents through project administration, training, event organization, and strategic development. Their website reflects a well-structured and professionally designed platform that communicates their mission and services effectively to their target audience. The presence of social media channels and a newsletter subscription indicates active community engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various plugins for enhanced user experience and functionality. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are implemented, with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism in place. However, explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not found, which is a compliance gap. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and no visible sensitive data exposure. Security headers are partially implemented, and no immediate vulnerabilities are detected in the provided content. The absence of a security policy or incident response information suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with a small regional non-profit. The lack of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the site content and structure support its authenticity. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pierigaspartneriba.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pierigaspartneriba.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pierigaspartneriba.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pierīgas partnerība holds a strong position as a local action group within the Latvian non-profit sector, focusing on community and regional development. Their competitive advantage lies in their integration of local stakeholders including residents, NGOs, entrepreneurs, and municipal authorities, enabling effective project implementation under the LEADER program. The business model revolves around providing support services, training, and event organization funded through ELFLA and other grants. Their target customers are local communities and social entrepreneurs seeking development assistance. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and regular news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes regional municipalities and European funding bodies. Operationally, the organization maintains a clear digital presence but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and basic security headers present. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of common WordPress plugins and libraries is up to date, minimizing vulnerability risks. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. The organization should prioritize publishing security and incident response information and implement stronger HTTP security headers to improve their security posture and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident management.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response plan and security policy to demonstrate security governance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Biedrība "Pierīgas partnerība"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība "Pierīgas partnerība"
Description
Biedrība "Pierīgas partnerība" is a local action group operating in the territories of Mārupes and Olaines municipalities, uniting active residents, organizations, entrepreneurs, and municipal representatives. It supports idea implementation, cares for territorial development, implements the LEADER approach, and administers project competitions for ELFLA funding.
Key services
Community strengthening, Training provision, Event organization, Experience trips, Strategy development, Support for social entrepreneurs, Visual material development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Cube Portfolio, Font Awesome 4 and 5, Mailchimp, Ultimate Maps by Supsystic, Fresh Framework plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by GDPR cookie compliance plugin)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Mailchimp, Mailmunch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit organization site focused on community and regional development.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English language option.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. No security or incident response policies published on the site.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain age and registrant info unknown.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Technical stack is modern and uses common WordPress plugins and libraries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5, leveraging a variety of plugins including Fresh Framework, Ultimate Maps, and Final Tiles Grid Gallery. The front-end uses Bootstrap 3.3.7 for responsive design, jQuery 3.7.1 for scripting, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics, while Facebook SDK supports social media integration. The site employs lazy loading for images and parallax effects for visual appeal. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the organization's needs but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pierigaspartneriba.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pierigaspartneriba.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.