Skip to main content

Security report for phoenixeagles.com

Phoenix Eagles · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Phoenix Eagles is a community-focused non-profit organization dedicated to soccer programs for youth and adults. Their offerings include various age-specific leagues and international tours, emphasizing player development beyond just the sport. The website is professionally designed using Squarespace, featuring modern multimedia elements such as video backgrounds and responsive layouts. Technically, the site employs standard web technologies and integrates third-party services like Google Maps and Weglot for translation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though some security headers are missing and privacy compliance is minimal due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but does not negate the legitimacy of the site given its professional presentation and active social media presence. Overall, the site is suitable for its target audience and maintains a moderate level of trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phoenixeagles.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention phoenixeagles.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for phoenixeagles.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Phoenix Eagles operate as a small non-profit in the sports sector, targeting youth and adult soccer players. Their business model revolves around community engagement and sports development programs. The organization leverages digital channels including social media platforms to reach and engage their audience. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information on the site suggests a focus on community rather than commercial enterprise. The use of Squarespace indicates a preference for ease of management and cost-effective web presence. Growth potential may be enhanced by adding clearer contact information, privacy compliance, and formal business disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and HSTS, protecting data in transit. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap, particularly with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Phoenix Eagles
Description
Phoenix Eagles is a soccer-focused organization passionate about soccer and people, offering various soccer programs for different age groups and skill levels. They emphasize player development beyond the game and have multiple programs including Summer Challenge, Boys Club, Eagles REC, Adult League, and International Tours.
Key services
Summer Challenge (ages 6-12), Boys Club (ages 13-18), Eagles REC (ages 6-12), Adult League (ages 18+), International Tours (ages 18+)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google Maps API, Weglot (translation), Typekit Fonts, Plyr Video Player
Platforms
Squarespace CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Weglot (translation), Squarespace marketing automations
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace with modern design and video background
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found
  4. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok
  5. No forms detected on the homepage content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No business registration or certification information found
  8. HTTPS and HSTS enabled indicating good SSL security
  9. No signs of malware or phishing
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its built-in CMS and hosting services. It integrates Google Maps API for location services and Weglot for multilingual support. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with responsive design for mobile optimization. Video content is delivered using the Plyr video player. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible in image loading and script management. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but could benefit from richer structured data and sitemap optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phoenixeagles.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phoenixeagles.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.