Skip to main content

Security report for philanthropy.com

The Chronicle of Philanthropy · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Chronicle of Philanthropy operates as a leading specialized news media outlet serving the philanthropic and nonprofit sectors. It provides in-depth news, opinion, advice, and job listings tailored to nonprofit organizations and philanthropic professionals. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with a subscription-based business model complemented by advertising revenue. Its market position is strong within its niche, supported by professional content and consistent branding. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, HubSpot, Marketo, Adobe DTM, and Google Tag Manager, hosted on a Brightspot CMS platform. The website is well-optimized for mobile devices, accessible, and SEO-friendly, delivering a good user experience with moderate performance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers such as Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site presents a low risk profile with high professionalism and trustworthiness. However, the absence of visible contact information and the lack of WHOIS transparency due to missing domain registration data slightly reduce the business credibility score. Strategic improvements in transparency and incident response readiness would further enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: unreachable.example.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching philanthropy.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Chronicle of Philanthropy holds a prominent position in the nonprofit media landscape, targeting philanthropic organizations and professionals seeking news and career resources. Its subscription and advertising revenue streams indicate a sustainable business model focused on specialized content. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes marketing and analytics providers such as HubSpot and Marketo, supporting audience engagement and monetization. Growth indicators include a well-maintained digital platform and active social media presence. The company’s operations emphasize content quality and user experience, catering to a niche but influential audience within the nonprofit sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms demonstrate compliance with data protection regulations. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page and lack of explicit incident response contacts represent gaps in security transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which could impact trust. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced communication of security practices and incident handling procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and accessible contact information including security incident contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  4. Enhance domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and accurate or provide justification for privacy protection.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and communicate security best practices to users to strengthen security culture and confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Description
The Chronicle of Philanthropy is the premier source of news, information, analysis, and opinion in the rapidly growing nonprofit world.
Key services
News, Opinion, Advice, Job listings
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, HubSpot, Marketo, Adobe DTM, Google Tag Manager, Google DoubleClick, Brightspot CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Marketo Munchkin
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Marketo, Adobe DTM
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Marketo, Adobe DTM
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional news media site focused on philanthropy and nonprofit sector
  3. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, reducing transparency
  7. No explicit security incident or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Brightspot CMS, jQuery, and marketing automation tools like HubSpot and Marketo. It integrates Google Tag Manager and DoubleClick for advertising and analytics. The site uses asynchronous script loading and polyfills for browser compatibility. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities and performance impact.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with philanthropy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review philanthropy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.