Skip to main content

Security report for pharmakon.dk

Pharmakon · Education management · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pharmakon.dk

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pharmakon operates in the healthcare and education sectors, focusing on pharmaceutical training and research. Its market position is strengthened by partnerships with related educational and conference entities. The business model revolves around providing specialized courses and knowledge dissemination to professionals in the life science industry. Revenue streams likely include course fees, conference services, and consultancy. The company maintains a clear contact and social media presence, enhancing customer engagement and trust. Growth indicators include a comprehensive course catalog and active research projects. Strategic partnerships with farmakonomuddannelsen.dk and pharmakon-konferencecenter.dk support its ecosystem. The website's professional design and GDPR-compliant cookie management reflect a mature digital strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure cookies and consent mechanisms, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The login form includes password fields but no explicit multi-factor authentication or advanced security features are evident. Incident response and security policies are not publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to improve header configurations and publish security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve communication with security researchers.
  4. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency or verify domain registration details to build trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pharmakon
Registration number
CVR: 10 03 88 39
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pharmakon
Description
Pharmakon tilbyder kurser, efteruddannelse og konsulentydelser til life science industrien og apoteker. Pharmakon forsker i sikker brug af medicin.
Key services
Courses (GMP, GDP, quality and compliance), E-learning, Research, Conference center services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookie Information Consent Management, ASP.NET (implied by cookie), JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login form with password field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookie Information
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Danish.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories and descriptions.
  3. No WHOIS data available from DK WHOIS server, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  4. Website uses modern analytics and tracking tools with privacy compliance.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No explicit security.txt or incident response information found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Website is mobile optimized and accessible.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pharmakon.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pharmakon.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

pharmakon.dk security report: 80/100, low risk | Guard