Skip to main content

Security report for phap.cz

Pavel Hnilička Architects+Planners, s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pavel Hnilička Architects+Planners is a small architectural firm based in Prague, Czech Republic, founded in 2020. The company specializes in architectural design and urban planning services, targeting clients interested in real estate development and architectural projects primarily in Prague. Their website showcases a portfolio of projects and provides contact details and social media links, reflecting a professional and credible business presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, with SEO optimization via Yoast plugin and multilingual support through qTranslate-XT. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Google Tag Manager for analytics but lacks important security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of phap.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phap.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the real estate and architectural sector, focusing on design and planning services. Its market position is that of a specialized small business with a clear local focus in Prague. The business model revolves around professional services with a portfolio-driven approach. The presence on social media platforms and a well-structured website supports client engagement and marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The company appears to be in a growth phase given its recent founding date. The lack of certifications or formal security policies suggests an opportunity to strengthen competitive advantage through compliance and trust-building measures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces tracking but lacks explicit user consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update all plugins, themes, and libraries to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency and trust by including incident response contact information and security best practices on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pavel Hnilička Architects+Planners, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pavel Hnilička Architects+Planners, s.r.o.
Description
Architectural office based in Prague offering architectural and planning services.
Key services
Architecture, Urbanism, Planning, Consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.5.2, jQuery 3.5.1, Lightbox2, Yoast SEO plugin, qTranslate-XT
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence on major platforms supports business credibility.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO plugins indicates good digital maturity.
  6. Security headers are missing or not detected, representing an area for improvement.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided.
  8. Content is professional and safe for general audiences.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 4.5.2 and jQuery 3.5.1, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. SEO is enhanced using the Yoast SEO plugin, and multilingual support is provided by qTranslate-XT. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting appears to be provided by websupport.cz, a Czech hosting provider consistent with the business location. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit privacy and cookie management, which could impact compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phap.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phap.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.