Skip to main content

Security report for pg.com

The Procter & Gamble Company · Retail · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Procter & Gamble Company operates a comprehensive and professionally designed website at us.pg.com, serving as a digital presence for its consumer goods business in the United States. The company is a global leader in manufacturing and retail of consumer products, with a strong emphasis on sustainability, innovation, and community impact. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure using modern technologies such as React and Next.js, hosted on Azure, and integrates advanced analytics and consent management tools to ensure compliance and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security headers should be verified. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear policies and consent mechanisms in place. The WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable, which is typical for subdomains, but the main domain pg.com is a well-established and trusted corporate domain. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pg.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
95
Email security
88
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Procter & Gamble maintains a strong market position as a leading manufacturer and retailer of consumer goods, targeting general consumers and business partners. The website supports multiple business functions including brand promotion, investor relations, supplier engagement, and career opportunities. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a broad ecosystem of related domains for specialized functions. The business model focuses on product innovation, sustainability, and social responsibility, which is clearly communicated on the site. The digital presence supports extensive marketing and analytics capabilities, indicating a data-driven approach to customer engagement and business growth.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of consent management for privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options were not explicitly found in the provided data and should be confirmed. There is no publicly disclosed incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security practices align well with industry standards for a large enterprise.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and explicitly implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to achieve excellent compliance with WCAG standards.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Procter & Gamble Company
Description
P&G is improving everyday life as a Force for Growth and a Force for Good — for you, for the world, and for generations to come.
Key services
Consumer products manufacturing, Brand management, Sustainability initiatives, Community impact programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Consent Management, Rudderstack, Segment
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Azure
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Analytics GA4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Rudderstack
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
The Trade Desk (match.adsrvr.org)
Tracking pixels
Segment, Rudderstack
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent design.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  4. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  5. No security or WAF blocking detected.
  6. WHOIS data not available for subdomain but main domain is trusted.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Clear contact and career information provided.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, hosted on Microsoft Azure, ensuring scalability and performance. It uses advanced analytics tools such as Google Analytics, GA4, Segment, and Rudderstack, integrated with a consent management platform (OneTrust) to comply with privacy regulations. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading and deferred script loading. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained and modern digital infrastructure suitable for a global enterprise.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100 +28Low20 findingsView report
  2. 58/100Medium20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.