Skip to main content

Security report for petershop.de

PETER JENSEN GmbH · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Petershop.de is an e-commerce platform operated by PETER JENSEN GmbH, primarily serving business customers in Germany. The website facilitates B2B retail transactions, offering product ordering, customer account management, and access to business documents such as invoices and delivery notes. The platform is designed with a professional and consistent branding approach, targeting a medium-sized business audience within the retail sector. Technically, the website employs a custom-built infrastructure with modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking while disabling cookies for privacy. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and responsive design. However, it lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure login forms. It includes JavaScript error logging to a server endpoint, which indicates proactive monitoring. Nonetheless, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. There is no explicit security policy or incident response contact information available, and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, which may impact compliance. Overall, the website is legitimate and trustworthy with a moderate security posture and good business credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency would enhance the platform's security and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petershop.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention petershop.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13
Employees
0
Customers
13
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for petershop.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PETER JENSEN GmbH operates Petershop.de as a B2B e-commerce retail platform targeting business customers in Germany. The company leverages a niche market position focusing on wholesale or business client product ordering. The business model centers on online retail with customer account management and document handling capabilities. The platform's integration with Matomo analytics suggests a focus on data-driven insights while maintaining user privacy by disabling cookies. The absence of public contact details and security policies indicates a potential area for operational improvement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and login forms are secured with password inputs. JavaScript error logging to a dedicated endpoint shows active monitoring. However, the lack of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS is a notable gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are present, and incident response contacts are not provided. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may affect GDPR compliance. The use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies is a positive privacy practice. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve compliance and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and custom scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PETER JENSEN GmbH
Description
Petershop is an e-commerce platform operated by PETER JENSEN GmbH, targeting business customers with a B2B shop for ordering products. The site offers login access, shop access requests, and customer registration.
Key services
Online product ordering, Customer account management, Document access (invoices, offers, delivery notes)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, HTML5 QR Code Scanner, Custom JS libraries (cgrd_logger, tcpj_app, etc)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Login form with password field
  • JavaScript error logging to server endpoint

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a B2B e-commerce platform for PETER JENSEN GmbH.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at business customers.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and includes privacy and terms pages.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. Uses Matomo for analytics with cookies disabled.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  9. Site includes multiple JavaScript widgets and custom scripts.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built CMS or platform with a modern front-end stack including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking and includes advanced features such as an HTML5 QR code scanner and voice command capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized and loads a variety of custom JavaScript widgets for enhanced user interaction. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. No major technical debt indicators are visible, but the absence of standard security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests areas for modernization. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the domain uses name servers ns.cgrd.de and ns.cgrd.net, indicating a stable DNS setup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petershop.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petershop.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.