Skip to main content

Security report for pergale.lt

AB VILNIAUS PERGALĖ · Retail · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AB VILNIAUS PERGALĖ is a well-established Lithuanian confectionery manufacturer with a history dating back to 1922. The company produces a wide range of sweets including chocolates, candies, biscuits, and truffles, serving both local and international markets with exports to over 45 countries. The website reflects a mature business with a consistent brand presence and a focus on quality and tradition. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, supports multiple languages, and implements Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Privacy and cookie policies are present with user consent mechanisms, indicating good compliance with GDPR requirements. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but security headers are missing and no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, though there is room for improvement in security best practices and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pergale.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pergale.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pergale.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the Lithuanian confectionery sector, leveraging a long heritage and national recognition. Its business model focuses on manufacturing and retail, targeting consumers and gourmets interested in premium sweets. The product range is broad, catering to diverse tastes and preferences. The company maintains active social media channels and has certifications such as palm oil certification, enhancing its brand credibility. The website content and structure support effective customer engagement and international reach. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company appears to be medium-sized with a clear focus on quality and tradition.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user options, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response plans, or data protection officer contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be elevated with additional best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AB VILNIAUS PERGALĖ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AB VILNIAUS PERGALĖ
Description
„Pergalės“ is a Lithuanian confectionery company with a history dating back to 1922, producing a wide range of sweets including chocolates, candies, crackers, and more. It is nationally recognized and exports products to over 45 countries worldwide.
Key services
Production of chocolates, Candies in boxes, Bulk candies, Crackers, Biscuits, Dragees, Truffles, Bars, Marshmallows
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Fancybox, Swiper, Google Translate, Google reCAPTCHA, Select2, Plupload
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian and multiple language options.
  2. Clear business focus on confectionery manufacturing and retail.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and user experience features.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and provide user consent options.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No explicit terms of service or incident response information found.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Fancybox, Swiper, Select2, Plupload, and Google services such as Translate and reCAPTCHA. The site is multi-lingual with Google Translate integration and supports responsive design for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with video content and multiple scripts, but no major issues detected. No CMS was identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pergale.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pergale.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.