Skip to main content

Security report for peresobralik.ee

EESTI LASTERIKASTE PEREDE LIIT · Non-profit · Estonia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.peresobralik.ee represents the Estonian non-profit organization Eesti Lasterikaste Perede Liit, which focuses on promoting family-friendly dining establishments through a certification mark. The site targets families with children in Estonia and provides information about the certification, news updates, and regional member organizations. The business model is non-profit and community-oriented, aiming to enhance societal recognition and support for families with children. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and utilizes common web technologies such as jQuery, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and has a clear navigation structure. However, it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not use analytics or tracking services, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is legitimate, safe, and professionally presented but has room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, supporting its trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peresobralik.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a recognized position in Estonia as the issuer of the Peresõbralik (family-friendly) dining certification, which is sought by numerous dining establishments. Its competitive advantage lies in its community-driven approach and focus on family values. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, certification fees, and event sponsorships. The target customers are families with children and dining establishments aiming to attract this demographic. Growth indicators include increasing numbers of certified establishments and active regional member organizations. The partnership ecosystem includes regional family organizations and possibly local governments or social entities. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding certification reach and enhancing digital presence to increase awareness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces its defense-in-depth posture. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident, which could delay response to security incidents. The minimal use of tracking and analytics reduces privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but requires enhancements to meet modern security and privacy standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EESTI LASTERIKASTE PEREDE LIIT
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EESTI LASTERIKASTE PEREDE LIIT
Description
Peresõbraliku toitlustusasutuse märgise väljaandmisega panustatakse peresõbralikuma ühiskonna kujundamisse, kus märgatakse ja väärtustatakse lastega peresid.
Key services
Issuing Peresõbralik (family-friendly) dining establishment marks, Promoting family-friendly dining culture, Organizing competitions and events related to family-friendly dining
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of deferred script loading for emoji script

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit site focused on family-friendly dining certification in Estonia.
  2. Content is in Estonian language and targets families with children.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is present but lacks detailed structured data.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is properly configured.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Site uses common external resources like Google Fonts and Font Awesome.
  9. Site content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS platform with common front-end libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. The use of Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhances visual appeal. The site loads scripts with defer attributes where applicable, improving performance. However, there is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility could be improved. The technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving SEO, and implementing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peresobralik.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peresobralik.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.