Skip to main content

Security report for pepa.lv

Baby Luxe, SIA · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PEPA.LV is an established Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in children's products and accessories, operated by Baby Luxe, SIA. The website offers a wide range of products including baby strollers, car seats, feeding and hygiene items, clothing, and toys, targeting parents and caregivers. The business appears to be a small-sized local player with a clear market focus and consistent branding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with caching and lazy loading implemented. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which could be improved for GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with clear contact information and privacy policy. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but business credibility is supported by consistent content and contact details. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing a security policy to improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pepa.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PEPA.LV operates as a niche e-commerce retailer focused on baby and children's products in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive product catalog tailored to local market needs, including specialized categories like twin strollers and Japanese diapers. The business model is direct online retail with promotions and a subscription newsletter to engage customers. The presence of partner links to price comparison and shopping aggregator sites suggests a strategy to increase visibility and sales. The company appears to be stable with a clear target audience and consistent branding, though growth indicators and revenue data are not publicly available.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and inform users about tracking and data collection.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Consider implementing a data protection officer contact or privacy compliance officer to strengthen GDPR adherence and customer trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baby Luxe, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baby Luxe, SIA
Description
Bērnu preču internetveikals
Key services
Online sales of baby strollers, Car seats and accessories, Feeding and hygiene products, Clothing, Promotions and discounts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO, W3 Total Cache
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WP Statistics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian e-commerce store specializing in children's products
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and product categories
  3. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain registration analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses WPBakery Page Builder for layout and design, and integrates several plugins for SEO (Yoast SEO), caching (W3 Total Cache), and analytics (Google Analytics, WP Statistics). The site loads scripts asynchronously and employs lazy loading for images, improving performance. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) are properly implemented. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pepa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pepa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.