People in Need · Non-profit · Czech Republic
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.
People in Need is a Czech-based non-governmental, non-profit organization with over 20 years of experience providing humanitarian aid and emergency assistance worldwide. The website serves as a platform to engage donors, volunteers, and the general public with information about their mission and activities. The organization maintains a consistent brand presence and targets a global audience interested in humanitarian causes. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, and Microsoft Clarity for analytics, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security measures such as HTTPS, CAPTCHA for forms, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, although some security headers and explicit policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be further investigated. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-conscious but could improve transparency by publishing privacy and security policies and providing direct contact information.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
Domain expires in 26 days
What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention peopleinneed.net, from OffSeq Breach.
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for peopleinneed.net.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with peopleinneed.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peopleinneed.net.