Skip to main content

Security report for penskelogistics.com

Penske Logistics · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Penske Logistics is a recognized leader in the transportation and logistics industry, offering innovative and results-oriented logistics services and solutions. The company targets businesses requiring comprehensive supply chain and distribution management, positioning itself as a large enterprise with a strong market presence in the United States. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear business messaging. Technically, the website leverages modern marketing and analytics technologies including Google Tag Manager, Demandbase, LinkedIn Insight, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. It is built on the RebelMouse CMS platform and employs service workers for enhanced performance. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, and there is no visible security policy or vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data is notably missing or unavailable, which slightly detracts from trustworthiness but may be due to privacy protection or lookup issues. Overall, the website presents a solid digital presence with good business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policy publication, and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of penskelogistics.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching penskelogistics.com

This scan found 6 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
69

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Penske Logistics operates as a B2B logistics services provider with a focus on transportation and distribution solutions. The company is positioned as a market leader with a large enterprise scale, serving clients primarily in the United States. Its business model revolves around providing end-to-end logistics solutions to optimize supply chains and avoid disruptions. The website's integration with multiple marketing and analytics platforms indicates a mature digital marketing strategy aimed at lead generation and customer engagement. The presence on major social media platforms supports brand awareness and recruitment efforts. No direct revenue streams or financial data are disclosed on the site, but the company's established brand and market position suggest significant operational scale. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not overshadow the company's evident market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent compliance via OneTrust. The use of service workers and modern JavaScript frameworks indicates an up-to-date technical stack. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no publicly visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust in enterprise environments. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Penske Logistics
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Penske Logistics
Description
Penske provides innovative logistics services and solutions using a results-oriented approach and extensive industry experience to meet your logistics needs.
Key services
Transportation, Distribution, Logistics solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Demandbase, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Service Worker, RebelMouse platform
Platforms
RebelMouse CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Service worker registered

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Demandbase
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, AppNexus (adnxs.com)
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Demandbase
Marketing tools
Marketo (implied by form classes), OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS registry, which is unusual for a large enterprise.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with OneTrust.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. Multiple marketing and tracking technologies are used.
  7. Contact information is present in structured data with email and phone.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  10. Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and service workers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the RebelMouse CMS platform and uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Demandbase, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. It employs service workers for offline capabilities and performance improvements. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks some security headers and explicit privacy/legal pages. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with penskelogistics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review penskelogistics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.