Skip to main content

Security report for pbterminal.eu

P&B Terminal · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

P&B Terminal is a medium-sized logistics and transportation company operating a large modern terminal located in the Riga Freeport customs zone in Latvia. The company offers a broad range of services including warehousing, cargo transportation, customs brokerage, and equipment services. Their website reflects a professional digital presence with clear contact information and multilingual support targeting business clients in the transportation sector. Technically, the site is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating some level of privacy compliance, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-structured but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pbterminal.eu

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a key player in the Latvian logistics market, leveraging its strategic location and extensive warehousing capacity to serve clients requiring efficient cargo handling and transportation services. The business model focuses on service provision in transportation and customs brokerage, targeting commercial clients. The presence of multiple social media channels and a multilingual website suggests an intent to engage a broad regional audience. The lack of detailed corporate registration data on the site limits deeper business intelligence, but the domain registration is consistent with a legitimate business entity. No suspicious domains or partners were identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of published privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could be improved. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and requires ongoing monitoring. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with formal documentation and security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy documents accessible from the website footer or header.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information including security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
P&B Terminal
Description
Uzņēmums P&B Terminal ir liels moderns terminālis, kas atrodas Rīgas brīvostas muitas zonā. Pateicoties lielām noliktavu platībām, 3 ha plašai teritorijai un ērtai atrašanās vietai varam piedāvāt klientam ātru un kvalitatīvu kravu apkalpošanu.
Key services
Noliktavas pakalpojumi (Warehousing services), Kravu pārvadājumi (Cargo transportation), Muitas brokeri (Customs brokerage), Mūsu tehnika (Equipment/technology services)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Bitrix CMS, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Swiper
Frameworks
Bitrix
Platforms
Bitrix CMS platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cookiebot for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional corporate site for a logistics and transportation company based in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with language toggles for English and Russian.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed with phone, email, physical address, and callback forms.
  4. Multiple social media channels are linked, indicating active digital presence.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  7. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, leveraging jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Swiper for UI components and interactivity. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as font size and color scheme adjustments. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of some scripts. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional corporate website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pbterminal.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pbterminal.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.