Skip to main content

Security report for patagonia.com

Patagonia Europe Coöperatief U.A. · Retail · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Patagonia Europe Coöperatief U.A. operates the eu.patagonia.com subdomain serving the UK and European markets, providing outdoor clothing and gear for activities such as climbing, surfing, skiing, fly fishing, and trail running. The company is a well-established global brand known for its commitment to sustainability and quality. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses a modern technology stack including Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Yottaa CDN, and various marketing and analytics tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and consent management in place. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating a mature and secure online presence. WHOIS data for the subdomain is not available, which is typical for subdomains, but the overall trustworthiness is high based on content and brand reputation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching patagonia.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention patagonia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,663
Employees
14
Customers
5,516
Third parties
133
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 20 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for patagonia.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –patagonia.com2026-06-13
  • –www.patagonia.com2026-05-16
  • –adfs.patagonia.com2026-05-13
  • –www.patagonia.com2026-04-20
  • –patagonia.com2026-02-24

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Patagonia's EU site targets outdoor enthusiasts with a comprehensive e-commerce platform offering a wide range of apparel and gear. The business model focuses on direct online sales supported by a strong brand identity and sustainability ethos. The company leverages advanced marketing tools and analytics to optimize customer engagement and conversion. The presence of multiple regional sister sites indicates a broad international footprint. The company maintains consistent branding and provides extensive product categorization and sport-specific collections, enhancing user experience and market segmentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with HTTPS, robust security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture aligns well with industry best practices for e-commerce platforms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear security contact information.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts for improved trust.
  5. Continue to monitor and update privacy and consent mechanisms to maintain compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Patagonia Europe Coöperatief U.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Patagonia Europe Coöperatief U.A.
Description
Patagonia is a designer of outdoor clothing and gear for the silent sports: climbing, surfing, skiing and snowboarding, fly fishing, and trail running
Key services
Design and sale of outdoor clothing, Sale of outdoor gear, Online retail platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Yottaa CDN, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, OneTrust, Demandware (Salesforce Commerce Cloud), Google Analytics, AB Tasty, FullStory, Yotpo
Frameworks
Salesforce Commerce Cloud
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, FullStory, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Yottaa, AB Tasty, Yotpo
Tracking pixels
FullStory, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, AB Tasty, Yotpo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional subdomain of Patagonia, a reputable outdoor apparel brand.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and third-party marketing/analytics tools.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  5. No security or content blocking detected.
  6. WHOIS data for subdomain is not available, which is typical for subdomains.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML; contact is via forms and customer service pages.
  8. Social media links are official and consistent with brand identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on Salesforce Commerce Cloud, leveraging a modern JavaScript-heavy front end with asynchronous loading and CDN acceleration via Yottaa. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms such as Klaviyo, AB Tasty, FullStory, and Google Analytics, enabling rich user behavior insights and targeted marketing. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good accessibility features and SEO practices. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and robust e-commerce experience, though complexity from multiple third-party integrations requires vigilant security and performance management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with patagonia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review patagonia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.