Skip to main content

Security report for partnerandpartners.com

Partner & Partners · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Partner & Partners is a worker-owned design practice established in 2011, specializing in print, exhibition, interactive, and identity design services. Their clientele includes organizations in art, architecture, government, and activism sectors, positioning them as a niche player with a socially engaged business model. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with high-quality content and clear navigation, targeting collaborators and clients in their specialized fields. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flickity, and Swiper. Hosting and DNS services are managed via Cloudflare, providing good performance and security infrastructure. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are absent, representing areas for improvement. The site employs Google Analytics and Jetpack Stats for user tracking, with moderate tracking levels and basic privacy compliance. Contact information is clearly presented, but no privacy, cookie, or security policies are published, which could impact compliance and user trust. Overall, the website is secure, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching partnerandpartners.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention partnerandpartners.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for partnerandpartners.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small, worker-owned design firm with a focus on socially conscious sectors such as art, architecture, government, and activism. Their business model emphasizes collaboration and specialized design services including print, exhibitions, interactive media, and identity branding. The firm has a mature domain registered since 2011, consistent with their operational history. They maintain a professional online presence with a well-structured website and active use of SEO and analytics tools. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests an opportunity to strengthen compliance and user trust. No direct e-commerce activity is evident despite WooCommerce integration, indicating potential future expansion or limited online sales. The company’s market position is niche but credible, supported by a clear portfolio and client list. No suspicious or unrelated domains are linked, and no privacy protection on WHOIS data indicates transparency.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer/update protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduce the overall security posture. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface from user input vulnerabilities. The use of up-to-date WordPress and plugins is implied but should be regularly audited to prevent vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness in case of security events. Tracking scripts are present but do not appear to expose sensitive data. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in DNS security and HTTP header hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add an incident response or security policy page with contact information for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Partner & Partners
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Partner & Partners
Description
We are a worker-owned design practice focusing on print, exhibition, interactive, and identity work with clients and collaborators in art, architecture, government, and activism.
Key services
print design, exhibition design, interactive design, identity work
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Flickity carousel, Swiper, WooCommerce 9.7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics (gtag.js), WordPress 6.8.3
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS, WooCommerce e-commerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional design practice with a clear focus on socially engaged sectors.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the main page or header.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No security or incident response policies are published on the website.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce but no e-commerce products visible on main page.
  6. Google Analytics and Jetpack Stats are used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled which is a minor security gap.
  9. No security headers detected in the HTML content provided.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML content; contact is via email link only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, although no active shop content is visible on the main page. It uses popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flickity, and Swiper for interactive UI components. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. SEO is enhanced using the Yoast SEO plugin, and Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by media-rich content such as images and videos. Accessibility features are basic but present. No forms were detected in the provided HTML, indicating limited data collection on the main page. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with partnerandpartners.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review partnerandpartners.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.